MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994110787

A Harmless Forgery

2007· article· en· W2994110787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Howard Norman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Conradian : the Journal of the Joseph Conrad Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicJoseph Conrad and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnecdoteHistoryMedicineClassicsLiteraturePsychologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

JOSEPH CONRAD is the author whose novels I re-read most often. Enough said about my reading life. Here is my only Conrad anecdote. In February 1977, I arrived from Baffin Island in the pale Arctic via Winnipeg to Halifax, Nova Scotia. From the airport I went directly to hospital. I knew that something was terribly wrong with me. It felt as if a hundred pound anvil was in my chest. I was fairly gasping for breath. Within an hour my left lung collapsed. Also, I was diagnosed as having pneumonia. In hospital I had an edition of Conrad's letters. In one he'd written to a friend about a mutual acquaintance (paraphrased), Donald, at the of tuberculosis as he is. The word gates struck me as operatic, almost religious prescience, foreshadowing a point in time and space Donald would eventually cross over into the afterlife. Anyway, the letters made a fine companion. I didn't know a soul in Halifax. My stay in hospital was ten days, during which medications kept me from the of complications from pneumonia, which the poor fellow, forty-four years my senior, in the neighbouring room, succumbed to. To the accompaniment of his percussive cough, I scarcely slept.All of was preface, however, to a small incident that offered me a chance to come to some knowledge of my decided limitations as an ethical person. Discharged with instructions from a stern doctor of how to build up my stamina and wind, I checked into the Lord Nelson hotel. I slept much of the next three or four days, then took a morning walk in the city. In a used and antiquarian bookshop I found a hardcover copy of The secret Agent. Mint condition, to my eye. What's it appeared to be actually signed by Conrad. There was his cursive signature on the title-page of first English edition. The price, written in pencil, was ten dollars. Now, to a person comporting himself with dignity, discovery may have prompted the question, Perhaps on closer inspection you'd care to sell book for more than ten dollars ... Surely was an oversight. I should say something to the owner, Mr Albert Moraigne. Yet within a moment's time I began to rationalize my choice not to bring Conrad's signature to anyone's attention. Someone in the shop indeed should have studied the book more carefully. That's their profession, after all. To rationalize further, I vowed, come hell or high water, I'd never sell the book in hand. Further yet, I had about thirty dollars to my name. (I was waiting for a cheque for some travel writing.) Therefore I was about to spend a third of my net worth. I delivered the book to the front desk.If I'm correct, I said, this will cost me ten dollars.The clerk, a woman in her late thirties, glanced at the first page and said, You're absolutely correct. Lovely book.I'd have thought a first edition would cost more, I said.Registering the sale in a ledger, today something of an antique process, she said, It's been marked down, actually.Oh, why is that? I said.The signature is a forgery, she said, matter-of-factly. ccYou see, a first edition like would be, even without a signature, worth a healthy sum. But with a forged signature, it's simply - how to say it? - 'soiled.' Do you still want it?Yes, I said.Good, she said. However, I was obliged to bring the signature to a customer's attention.She wrapped the novel in flowery paper and sealed it with Scotch tape.Looking to my right and up a winding staircase, I noticed Mr Moraigne peering down, eavesdropping, as it were. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Conradian : the Journal of the Joseph Conrad SocietySame topicJoseph Conrad and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207