Internationalizing Business Curricula: Introducing the Study of Canada into International Business Programs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Recent debates about American jobs lost to Mexico, illegal Mexican immigrants, plant closings and machiladora plants on the border of Mexico and the U.S. would suggest to the uninformed reader that NAFTA is a bilateral trade agreement. Forgotten amongst the hoopla about Mexican-American trade relations is the fact that Canada remains the largest single trading partner of the U.S. Ironically, in spite of its importance to the American economy, very few studies have addressed Canada as a relevant topic in undergraduate or graduate business programs. Using the extant literature on internationalizing the business curriculum, this paper uses a number of sources of research data to argue for the introduction of the study of Canada into the international business curricula of American business schools and colleges. Attention is given to specific reasons the study of Canada, called Canadian Studies, should be included in international business curricula. This research suggests a variety of options for incorporating Canadian Studies into international business programs. INTRODUCTION Since the inception of NAFTA, trade between the U.S. and its southern and northern trading partners has grown immensely. Much of the debate about NAFTA has focused on Mexico and the phenomenal growth of its trade with the U.S. Lost somewhere among the debates on Americanjobs lost to Mexico, illegal Mexican immigrants, trade deficits, plant closings and machiladora plants on the border of Mexico and the U.S., is the fact that Canada remains the largest single trading partner of the U.S. In fact, the Canadian government reports growth in bilateral trade between Canada and the U. S of almost six percent over the last 10 years (Government of Canada, 2007). Ironically, in spite of its importance to the American economy, very few studies have addressed Canada as a relevant topic in undergraduate or graduate business programs. Using the extant literature on internationalizing the business curriculum, this paper uses a number of sources of research data to argue for the introduction of the study of Canada into the business curricula of American business schools and colleges. Attention is given to specific reasons the study of Canada, called Canadian Studies, should be included in business curricula. This research suggests a variety of options for incorporating Canadian Studies into business programs. The study concludes with a brief discussion of the option that would require the highest level of commitment, sending students to Canada to learn about Canada. The Laval University Summer Business School is used as an example of an effective way to immerse American students in Canadian Studies, an option that is far more affordable and practical than trips to Spain, Japan, or Brazil. In this study, we (1) briefly review the extant literature on of /\merican business education, (b) discuss the significance of Canada as a topic of study in international business, (c) discuss four ways American schools and colleges of business can incorporate the study of Canada into their business programs, and (d) offer our concluding comments on this important topic. LITERATURE REVIEW In the following section, we briefly discuss the extant literature on internationalizing /\merican business education. After perusing the literature it becomes quite clear that a very large number of studies have been conducted that examine various aspects of business school internationalization (Kwok, Arpan, & Folks, 1994, p. 606). These studies have ranged in both their depth and breadth of coverage in subjects such as, but not limited to, characteristics of international education (Trevino and Melton, 2002), ways both AACSB and non- AACSB schools and colleges have tried to internationalize their curriculums, and student motives for study abroad (Albers-Miller, Sigerstad, and Straughan, 1 999). We generally tell our undergraduate students in business in the United States that we live in a global economy. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».