Internationalizing Business Curricula: Introducing the Study of Canada into International Business Programs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Recent debates about American jobs lost to Mexico, illegal Mexican immigrants, plant closings and machiladora plants on the border of Mexico and the U.S. would suggest to the uninformed reader that NAFTA is a bilateral trade agreement. Forgotten amongst the hoopla about Mexican-American trade relations is the fact that Canada remains the largest single trading partner of the U.S. Ironically, in spite of its importance to the American economy, very few studies have addressed Canada as a relevant topic in undergraduate or graduate business programs. Using the extant literature on internationalizing the business curriculum, this paper uses a number of sources of research data to argue for the introduction of the study of Canada into the international business curricula of American business schools and colleges. Attention is given to specific reasons the study of Canada, called Canadian Studies, should be included in international business curricula. This research suggests a variety of options for incorporating Canadian Studies into international business programs. INTRODUCTION Since the inception of NAFTA, trade between the U.S. and its southern and northern trading partners has grown immensely. Much of the debate about NAFTA has focused on Mexico and the phenomenal growth of its trade with the U.S. Lost somewhere among the debates on Americanjobs lost to Mexico, illegal Mexican immigrants, trade deficits, plant closings and machiladora plants on the border of Mexico and the U.S., is the fact that Canada remains the largest single trading partner of the U.S. In fact, the Canadian government reports growth in bilateral trade between Canada and the U. S of almost six percent over the last 10 years (Government of Canada, 2007). Ironically, in spite of its importance to the American economy, very few studies have addressed Canada as a relevant topic in undergraduate or graduate business programs. Using the extant literature on internationalizing the business curriculum, this paper uses a number of sources of research data to argue for the introduction of the study of Canada into the business curricula of American business schools and colleges. Attention is given to specific reasons the study of Canada, called Canadian Studies, should be included in business curricula. This research suggests a variety of options for incorporating Canadian Studies into business programs. The study concludes with a brief discussion of the option that would require the highest level of commitment, sending students to Canada to learn about Canada. The Laval University Summer Business School is used as an example of an effective way to immerse American students in Canadian Studies, an option that is far more affordable and practical than trips to Spain, Japan, or Brazil. In this study, we (1) briefly review the extant literature on of /\merican business education, (b) discuss the significance of Canada as a topic of study in international business, (c) discuss four ways American schools and colleges of business can incorporate the study of Canada into their business programs, and (d) offer our concluding comments on this important topic. LITERATURE REVIEW In the following section, we briefly discuss the extant literature on internationalizing /\merican business education. After perusing the literature it becomes quite clear that a very large number of studies have been conducted that examine various aspects of business school internationalization (Kwok, Arpan, & Folks, 1994, p. 606). These studies have ranged in both their depth and breadth of coverage in subjects such as, but not limited to, characteristics of international education (Trevino and Melton, 2002), ways both AACSB and non- AACSB schools and colleges have tried to internationalize their curriculums, and student motives for study abroad (Albers-Miller, Sigerstad, and Straughan, 1 999). We generally tell our undergraduate students in business in the United States that we live in a global economy. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".