Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I. GLOBAL ASSESSMENT AND OUTLOOKIn the first quarter of 2015, economic growth in the major countries, which maintain quarterly national accounts, was weaker than in any quarter since the end of the great recession. Revised and more complete estimates of real GDP show negative growth rates in the United States and Canada and anemic growth rates in most of the other countries.In the worldwide business cycle, the group of the Englishspeaking countries has led historically global economic activity. Monthly predictive analytics signal an underlying weakness for several months in the English-speaking countries, which have posted negative or steadily declining growth rates in their leading indicators.Globally, trade predictive analytics, which summarize worldwide merchandize exports, clearly point out an undergoing global slowdown contradicting the mediacreated myth of transitory snowstorms in New England as the cause of an economic downswing in the United States in the first quarter of this year. In March of this year, global exports, on a year-to-year basis, declined by 12.4%, the sixth consecutive monthly decline in a row following an expansion since October 2014. On a quarterly basis, in the first quarter of 2015 global exports dropped 10.2% from a year ago to $3.7 trillion, following a 2.6% decline in the last quarter of 2014. A major trigger for such dramatic changes in each county's business cycle has been the burst of the oil-price bubble coupled with currency realignments from the strengthening of the U.S. dollar as well as a slowdown in the growth in emerging economies.In addition to geopolitical risks related to the Middle East and Eastern Europe, there is high probability of one or more policy-created bubbles bursting this year. A hard landing in China from housing prices and/or stock market corrections; disintegration of the Euro Area; high debtto-income ratios-both private and public-in several countries; and the timing of an exit from an ill-conceived and permanent-perceived monetary policy of zero interest rates in the United States. Any of these events may trigger a significant correction in stock markets leading to another major recession with no tools left for economic policy.Assigning a 40% probability that any of these events will come suddenly into play this year and thus the risks will be gradually and orderly managed over the long run, we consider the current global economic slowdown to be a soft patch, which will maintain over the forecast horizon the ongoing moderate six-year-old path of recovery. Under these conditions, the baseline forecast predicts worldwide output to increase by just 2.7% in 2015, which is 0.5% below the moderate growth of 3.3% in 2014. Under this scenario, global economic growth is expected to stay on the existing trajectory for the rest of the decade with low investment, slowing productivity, lack of job creation, declining real wages, and halving of the growth in international trade from its established long-term trend for decades before the great recession.In the inflation front, the effect of lower energy prices has evaporated as oil prices quickly ended their free fall. It is expected over the forecast horizon oil prices will fluctuate around one-half of their latest peak. Inflationary expectations have begun to build up again driven by rising labor costs from social pressures in a climate of declining or stalling productivity.II. SHORT-TERM INDICATORS AND FORECASTSThe baseline forecast incorporates major findings of the World Economic Survey conducted in the second quarter of 2015 by the Center for Economic Studies (CES) at the Ludwig Maximilian University and the German Ifo Institute. About 1,100 executives from 115 countries have indicated that the world's economic climate edged up for a second quarter in a row after tumbling in the last quarter of 2014. The major findings of the second quarter's survey are as follows:* Worldwide, executives evaluated the current economic situation, second quarter of 2015, to be slightly above satisfactory levels, led by an improvement in consumer expenditures while capital expenditures remain below satisfactory levels. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».