MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2997716483 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-125128

Optimizing Hydroxyurea Dosing in Sickle Cell Anemia: The Uganda MTD Study

2019· article· en· W2997716483 sur OpenAlexaff
Chandy C. John, Robert O. Opoka, Teresa Latham, Heather Hume, Maria Nakafeero, Phillip Kasirye, Christopher M Ndugwa, Adam Lane, Russell E. Ware

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDosingFetal hemoglobinAnemiaAdverse effectClinical trialSickle cell anemiaMalariaRegimenHydroxycarbamideRandomizationInternal medicinePediatricsChemotherapyPregnancyDiseaseImmunologyFetus

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction. Hydroxyurea treatment has proven safety, feasibility, and efficacy for children with sickle cell anemia living in sub-Saharan Africa. Even in malaria endemic regions, hydroxyurea is safe and has been shown to reduce vaso-occlusive events and lower mortality. The optimal dosing regimen is not known, however, and specifically whether a fixed dose at 15-20 mg/kg/day is better than escalation to maximum tolerated dose (MTD) at 25-30 mg/kg/day. Particularly in low-resource settings, additional drug-related toxicities and monitoring costs associated with dose escalation could outweigh potential laboratory and clinical benefits. Methods. Children with sickle cell anemia previously enrolled in NOHARM (NCT01976416) received hydroxyurea at ~20 mg/kg/day during the open-label portion of that trial, after which they transitioned to commercial supply at that same daily dose. All were then offered enrollment in the NOHARM MTD trial (NCT03128515), a double-blinded trial with 1:1 randomization between continuing fixed-dose oral hydroxyurea (20 ± 2.5 mg/kg/day) versus dose-escalation to MTD (30 ± 2.5 mg/kg/day), using hydroxyurea tablets donated by Addmedica. The primary study outcome was the proportion of study participants who achieved either hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL or fetal hemoglobin ≥20% after 24 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes included sickle-related clinical adverse events, malaria events, and laboratory toxicities. We now present the main results of the NOHARM MTD trial. Results. A total of 187 children enrolled and began study treatment: 94 children (4.8 ± 0.9 years, 55 males) received hydroxyurea at fixed dose versus 93 who received hydroxyurea with dose escalation (4.6 ± 1.0 years, 47 males). At Month 6 of study treatment the average doses were 19.3 ± 1.7 mg/kg/day and 29.0 ± 3.5 mg/kg/day, respectively, and these dose differences were continued through Month 12 and Month 18. The trial was terminated prematurely by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board after 146 children had reached Month 18, when the clinical complications and interventions were significantly fewer among children randomized to MTD compared to fixed-dose. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) included the following: all sickle-related Adverse Events [IRR = 0.43, CI = (0.34, 0.56), P<0.00001]; vaso-occlusive crises [IRR = 0.43, CI = (0.33, 0.56), P<0.00001]; acute chest syndrome/pneumonia [IRR = 0.27, CI = (0.11, 0.55), P=0.001]; transfusions [IRR = 0.29, CI = (0.20, 0.43), P<0.00001]; and hospitalizations [IRR = 0.21, CI = (0.13, 0.34), P<0.00001]. The rates of Laboratory Adverse Events were similar between treatment arms [IRR = 0.83, CI = (0.60, 1.15), P=NS] and dose-limiting toxicities were equivalent [IRR = 1.01, CI = (0.66, 1.54), P=NS] without any episodes of severe neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Superior laboratory benefits were observed in the dose-escalation arm, with higher hemoglobin (8.7 versus 8.3 g/dL, P=0.006) and fetal hemoglobin (30.5 versus 18.2%, P<0.0001), and lower reticulocyte counts (157 versus 261 x 109/L, P<0.0001) and neutrophil counts (3.4 versus 5.1 x 109/L, P<0.0001). At the time of study closure, more children on the dose-escalation arm had achieved the primary study endpoint compared to those on fixed-dose hydroxyurea (86% versus 37%, P<0.0001). Conclusion. NOHARM MTD is the first randomized controlled clinical trial to compare hydroxyurea at fixed-dose versus escalation to MTD in either high- or low-resource settings. Hydroxyurea escalated to MTD at ~30 mg/kg/day had superior clinical and laboratory efficacy compared to fixed-dose treatment at ~20 mg/kg/day in this high-risk population, without any increase in toxicity. Optimal hydroxyurea dosing to MTD at ~30 mg/kg/day is therefore recommended for children with sickle cell anemia living in sub-Saharan Africa, which represents an important paradigm shift from the concept of low-dose daily treatment. Increasing access to hydroxyurea at optimal doses will require concerted efforts that include training and implementation strategies, to enable safe and effective hydroxyurea dose escalation for children in low-resource settings. Disclosures Ware: Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Research Drug Donation; Addmedica: Other: Research Drug Donation; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nova Laboratories: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: DSMB.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,579
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,324

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207