MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997716483 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-125128

Optimizing Hydroxyurea Dosing in Sickle Cell Anemia: The Uganda MTD Study

2019· article· en· W2997716483 on OpenAlexaff
Chandy C. John, Robert O. Opoka, Teresa Latham, Heather Hume, Maria Nakafeero, Phillip Kasirye, Christopher M Ndugwa, Adam Lane, Russell E. Ware

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDosingFetal hemoglobinAnemiaAdverse effectClinical trialSickle cell anemiaMalariaRegimenHydroxycarbamideRandomizationInternal medicinePediatricsChemotherapyPregnancyDiseaseImmunologyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Hydroxyurea treatment has proven safety, feasibility, and efficacy for children with sickle cell anemia living in sub-Saharan Africa. Even in malaria endemic regions, hydroxyurea is safe and has been shown to reduce vaso-occlusive events and lower mortality. The optimal dosing regimen is not known, however, and specifically whether a fixed dose at 15-20 mg/kg/day is better than escalation to maximum tolerated dose (MTD) at 25-30 mg/kg/day. Particularly in low-resource settings, additional drug-related toxicities and monitoring costs associated with dose escalation could outweigh potential laboratory and clinical benefits. Methods. Children with sickle cell anemia previously enrolled in NOHARM (NCT01976416) received hydroxyurea at ~20 mg/kg/day during the open-label portion of that trial, after which they transitioned to commercial supply at that same daily dose. All were then offered enrollment in the NOHARM MTD trial (NCT03128515), a double-blinded trial with 1:1 randomization between continuing fixed-dose oral hydroxyurea (20 ± 2.5 mg/kg/day) versus dose-escalation to MTD (30 ± 2.5 mg/kg/day), using hydroxyurea tablets donated by Addmedica. The primary study outcome was the proportion of study participants who achieved either hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL or fetal hemoglobin ≥20% after 24 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes included sickle-related clinical adverse events, malaria events, and laboratory toxicities. We now present the main results of the NOHARM MTD trial. Results. A total of 187 children enrolled and began study treatment: 94 children (4.8 ± 0.9 years, 55 males) received hydroxyurea at fixed dose versus 93 who received hydroxyurea with dose escalation (4.6 ± 1.0 years, 47 males). At Month 6 of study treatment the average doses were 19.3 ± 1.7 mg/kg/day and 29.0 ± 3.5 mg/kg/day, respectively, and these dose differences were continued through Month 12 and Month 18. The trial was terminated prematurely by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board after 146 children had reached Month 18, when the clinical complications and interventions were significantly fewer among children randomized to MTD compared to fixed-dose. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) included the following: all sickle-related Adverse Events [IRR = 0.43, CI = (0.34, 0.56), P<0.00001]; vaso-occlusive crises [IRR = 0.43, CI = (0.33, 0.56), P<0.00001]; acute chest syndrome/pneumonia [IRR = 0.27, CI = (0.11, 0.55), P=0.001]; transfusions [IRR = 0.29, CI = (0.20, 0.43), P<0.00001]; and hospitalizations [IRR = 0.21, CI = (0.13, 0.34), P<0.00001]. The rates of Laboratory Adverse Events were similar between treatment arms [IRR = 0.83, CI = (0.60, 1.15), P=NS] and dose-limiting toxicities were equivalent [IRR = 1.01, CI = (0.66, 1.54), P=NS] without any episodes of severe neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Superior laboratory benefits were observed in the dose-escalation arm, with higher hemoglobin (8.7 versus 8.3 g/dL, P=0.006) and fetal hemoglobin (30.5 versus 18.2%, P<0.0001), and lower reticulocyte counts (157 versus 261 x 109/L, P<0.0001) and neutrophil counts (3.4 versus 5.1 x 109/L, P<0.0001). At the time of study closure, more children on the dose-escalation arm had achieved the primary study endpoint compared to those on fixed-dose hydroxyurea (86% versus 37%, P<0.0001). Conclusion. NOHARM MTD is the first randomized controlled clinical trial to compare hydroxyurea at fixed-dose versus escalation to MTD in either high- or low-resource settings. Hydroxyurea escalated to MTD at ~30 mg/kg/day had superior clinical and laboratory efficacy compared to fixed-dose treatment at ~20 mg/kg/day in this high-risk population, without any increase in toxicity. Optimal hydroxyurea dosing to MTD at ~30 mg/kg/day is therefore recommended for children with sickle cell anemia living in sub-Saharan Africa, which represents an important paradigm shift from the concept of low-dose daily treatment. Increasing access to hydroxyurea at optimal doses will require concerted efforts that include training and implementation strategies, to enable safe and effective hydroxyurea dose escalation for children in low-resource settings. Disclosures Ware: Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Research Drug Donation; Addmedica: Other: Research Drug Donation; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nova Laboratories: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: DSMB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207