MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W300367934

Putting Herself Forward: Naming and Performance in Sandra Birdsell's the Russlander

2003· review· en· W300367934 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Tiessen

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œMennonite quarterly review · 2003
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAgriculture and Farm Safety
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRealmIdentity (music)Power (physics)SentenceLiteratureHistorySociologyAestheticsArtPhilosophyLinguistics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract: Sandra Birdsell's The Russlander portrays Mennonite world in Russia at end of imperial era when Mennonites--as actors and spectators enjoying their own society--liked to display effects of their material ambitions and inheritances. Personal names--suggesting aspirations, enacting control--became part of their Birdsell's protagonist, young Katherine (Katya) Vogt, indulging in childlike pleasures but growing self-conscious upon experiencing impact of social class, discovers that her gentle inscriptions of her mark her identity in terms of a debilitating class structure that understands itself in commodity terms. Birdsell, in one strand of her rich novel, also carries her investigation of naming and into Mennonites' changed social conditions in post-war Russia and, finally, Canada. ********** the movement of his hand across paper was not an embellishment but rehearsal of his name --Patrick Friesen (1) In The Russlander (2001), Sandra Birdsell's beautiful and haunting new novel about Mennonites in Russia during period 1910-23, (2) opening lines of Chapter 1 invite readers to enter subjective realm of protagonist Katherine Vogt, or and observe enchantment and power that she recalls having felt when, as a young child, she first wrote her own name. Simultaneously, Birdsell invites us to understand Katya's experience in terms that exceed Katya's conscious intention, and that focus on Katya's activity as though it might well be regarded as a performance of her very identity. Thus, first sentence of Chapter I introduces a lyrical meditation on deeply configured interweaving that occurs between personal identity and performance of one's name: She [Katya] would always remember awe, swelling in her breastbone when she'd first seen her written, Lydia guiding her hand across a slate (5). Exquisitely, deliciously, name--rendered visible here--gives confident shape to personal identity and in turn takes on shape of that identity. In Katya's case, her parents bestowed on her a culturally fluid name. They were signalling to their Mennonite community something of their fantasy of their daughter's future role in that community's ongoing performance. When Katya was born in early 1900s, name's overtones looked boldly to imperial center, particularly recalling Catherine Great of Russia, empress who in 1780s invited Mennonites into Russia in first place. And they looked also, through Katya, to contemporary styles revealing a Mennonite inclination for fashionable flirting with neighboring Russian identities. (3) Katya's innocent preoccupation with her name, along with what are for her its gently intoxifying effects, continues in second sentence: When she had learned to make her she began to herself forward, traced K.V. in lemon polish on a chair back, through frost on a window, icing on a cookie. K.V. Which meant: Me, I. Which was: Her. A high-minded child, body small for her age, and so alive.... She'd been a tiny yeasty and doughy person going to and fro with a huff and a puff, as though day was all she had, and at same time, thinking day would go on for good. As though she were living in eternity (5). We encounter here a protagonist whose delicately budding sense of self excites and engages our sympathy toward her and her gentle-hearted ambitions. We readily indulge her innocent feeling that her soft reiterations of her provided her with a means of gaining some control over her place in her social world, a means to put herself forward within social context in which she has begun to enwrap herself. Even when, a few lines later, narrator takes us out of solipsistic delights that child imagines for herself (4)--delights, to be sure, made worrisome for reader by narrator's ominous use of conditional--we still cling to feeling that Katya's lively spirit will provide prevailing narrative energy of novel. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,995
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,569

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œMennonite quarterly reviewMême sujetAgriculture and Farm SafetyTravaux en français237 207