MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W300367934

Putting Herself Forward: Naming and Performance in Sandra Birdsell's the Russlander

2003· review· en· W300367934 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Tiessen

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œMennonite quarterly review · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Farm Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmIdentity (music)Power (physics)SentenceLiteratureHistorySociologyAestheticsArtPhilosophyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Sandra Birdsell's The Russlander portrays Mennonite world in Russia at end of imperial era when Mennonites--as actors and spectators enjoying their own society--liked to display effects of their material ambitions and inheritances. Personal names--suggesting aspirations, enacting control--became part of their Birdsell's protagonist, young Katherine (Katya) Vogt, indulging in childlike pleasures but growing self-conscious upon experiencing impact of social class, discovers that her gentle inscriptions of her mark her identity in terms of a debilitating class structure that understands itself in commodity terms. Birdsell, in one strand of her rich novel, also carries her investigation of naming and into Mennonites' changed social conditions in post-war Russia and, finally, Canada. ********** the movement of his hand across paper was not an embellishment but rehearsal of his name --Patrick Friesen (1) In The Russlander (2001), Sandra Birdsell's beautiful and haunting new novel about Mennonites in Russia during period 1910-23, (2) opening lines of Chapter 1 invite readers to enter subjective realm of protagonist Katherine Vogt, or and observe enchantment and power that she recalls having felt when, as a young child, she first wrote her own name. Simultaneously, Birdsell invites us to understand Katya's experience in terms that exceed Katya's conscious intention, and that focus on Katya's activity as though it might well be regarded as a performance of her very identity. Thus, first sentence of Chapter I introduces a lyrical meditation on deeply configured interweaving that occurs between personal identity and performance of one's name: She [Katya] would always remember awe, swelling in her breastbone when she'd first seen her written, Lydia guiding her hand across a slate (5). Exquisitely, deliciously, name--rendered visible here--gives confident shape to personal identity and in turn takes on shape of that identity. In Katya's case, her parents bestowed on her a culturally fluid name. They were signalling to their Mennonite community something of their fantasy of their daughter's future role in that community's ongoing performance. When Katya was born in early 1900s, name's overtones looked boldly to imperial center, particularly recalling Catherine Great of Russia, empress who in 1780s invited Mennonites into Russia in first place. And they looked also, through Katya, to contemporary styles revealing a Mennonite inclination for fashionable flirting with neighboring Russian identities. (3) Katya's innocent preoccupation with her name, along with what are for her its gently intoxifying effects, continues in second sentence: When she had learned to make her she began to herself forward, traced K.V. in lemon polish on a chair back, through frost on a window, icing on a cookie. K.V. Which meant: Me, I. Which was: Her. A high-minded child, body small for her age, and so alive.... She'd been a tiny yeasty and doughy person going to and fro with a huff and a puff, as though day was all she had, and at same time, thinking day would go on for good. As though she were living in eternity (5). We encounter here a protagonist whose delicately budding sense of self excites and engages our sympathy toward her and her gentle-hearted ambitions. We readily indulge her innocent feeling that her soft reiterations of her provided her with a means of gaining some control over her place in her social world, a means to put herself forward within social context in which she has begun to enwrap herself. Even when, a few lines later, narrator takes us out of solipsistic delights that child imagines for herself (4)--delights, to be sure, made worrisome for reader by narrator's ominous use of conditional--we still cling to feeling that Katya's lively spirit will provide prevailing narrative energy of novel. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œMennonite quarterly reviewSame topicAgriculture and Farm SafetyFrench-language works237,207