MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3005766885 · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30012-1

Health-care costs of inflammatory bowel disease in a pan-European, community-based, inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up: a population-based study

2020· article· en· W3005766885 sur OpenAlexaff
Johan Burisch, Hillel Vardi, Doron Schwartz, Michael Friger, Gediminas Kiudelis, Juozas Kupčinskas, Mathurin Fuméry, Corinne Gower‐Rousseau, Péter L. Lakatos, R. D’Incà, Alessandro Sartini, Daniela Valpiani, M. Giannotta, Naila Arebi, Dana Duricova, Martin Bortlík, Stefania Chetcuti Zammit, Pierre Ellul, Natalia Pedersen, Jens Kjeldsen, Jóngerð Midjord, Kári Rubek Nielsen, Karina Winther Andersen, Vibeke Andersen, Konstantinos H. Katsanos, Dimitrios Christodoulou, Viktor Domislović, Željko Krznarić, Shaji Sebastian, Pia Oksanen, Pekka Collin, Luísa Leite Barros, Fernando Magro, Riina Salupere, Hendrika Adriana Linda Kievit, Adrian Goldiș, Ioannis Kaimakliotis, Jens F Dahlerup, Carl Eriksson, Jonas Halfvarson, Alberto Fernández, Vicent Hernandez, Svetlana Turcan, Elena Belousova, Ebbe Langholz, Pia Munkholm, Selwyn Odes, Nikša Turk, Silvija Čuković‐Čavka, Anastasia Nicolaou, Milan Lukáš, Olga Shonová, Birgitte Blichfeldt, Dorte Marker, Katrine Carlsen, Petra Weimers, Clays Aalykke, Karen Kudsk, Ida Vind, Niels Thorsgaard, Alexandros Skamnelos, Dimitrios Politis, Zsuzsanna Végh, Peterne Demenyi, Szabina Nemethne Kramli, Giualia Dal Piaz, A. Santini, Giulia Girardin, Limas Kupčinskas, Laimas Jonaitis, Irena Valantienė, Romanas Zykus, Rūta Kučinskienė, Daniela Lazăr, Inna Nikulina, Luisa de Castro, Juan-Ramon Pineda, Santos Pereira, J Martínez-Cadilla, L Sanromán, Montserrat Figueira, D. Martínez Ares, J I Rodríguez-Prada, Amalia Carmona, Carlos González-Portela, Ulla-Britt Widen, Sally Myers, Katherine M. Ashton, Emma Whitehead

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInflammatory Bowel Disease
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesJanssen PharmaceuticalsDr. Falk PharmaFerring PharmaceuticalsShireMeso Scale DiagnosticsAbbVieTakeda Pharmaceutical CompanyNovartisPfizer
Mots-clésInflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineCohortCohort studyHealth careDiseaseEnvironmental healthFamily medicineGerontologyDemographyInternal medicineEconomic growthEconomicsSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) places a significant burden on health-care systems because of its chronicity and need for expensive therapies and surgery. With increasing use of biological therapies, contemporary data on IBD health-care costs are important for those responsible for allocating resources in Europe. To our knowledge, no prospective long-term analysis of the health-care costs of patients with IBD in the era of biologicals has been done in Europe. We aimed to investigate cost profiles of a pan-European, community-based inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: The Epi-IBD cohort is a community-based, prospective inception cohort of unselected patients with IBD diagnosed in 2010 at centres in 20 European countries plus Israel. Incident patients who were diagnosed with IBD according to the Copenhagen Diagnostic Criteria between Jan 1, and Dec 31, 2010, and were aged 15 years or older the time of diagnosis were prospectively included. Data on clinical characteristics and direct costs (investigations and outpatient visits, blood tests, treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries) were collected prospectively using electronic case-report forms. Patient-level costs incorporated procedures leading to the initial diagnosis of IBD and costs of IBD management during the 5-year follow-up period. Costs incurred by comorbidities and unrelated to IBD were excluded. We grouped direct costs into the following five categories: investigations (including outpatient visits and blood tests), conventional medical treatment, biological therapy, hospitalisation, and surgery. FINDINGS: The study population consisted of 1289 patients with IBD, with 1073 (83%) patients from western Europe and 216 (17%) from eastern Europe. 488 (38%) patients had Crohn's disease, 717 (56%) had ulcerative colitis, and 84 (6%) had IBD unclassified. The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up for patients with IBD was €2609 (SD 7389; median €446 [IQR 164-1849]). The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up was €3542 (8058; median €717 [214-3512]) for patients with Crohn's disease, €2088 (7058; median €408 [133-1161]) for patients with ulcerative colitis, and €1609 (5010; median €415 [92-1228]) for patients with IBD unclassified (p<0·0001). Costs were highest in the first year and then decreased significantly during follow-up. Hospitalisations and diagnostic procedures accounted for more than 50% of costs during the first year. However, in subsequent years there was a steady increase in expenditure on biologicals, which accounted for 73% of costs in Crohn's disease and 48% in ulcerative colitis, in year 5. The mean annual cost per patient-year for biologicals was €866 (SD 3056). The mean yearly costs of biological therapy were higher in patients with Crohn's disease (€1782 [SD 4370]) than in patients with ulcerative colitis (€286 [1427]) or IBD unclassified (€521 [2807]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Overall direct expenditure on health care decreased over a 5-year follow-up period. This period was characterised by increasing expenditure on biologicals and decreasing expenditure on conventional medical treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries. In light of the expenditures associated with biological therapy, cost-effective treatment strategies are needed to reduce the economic burden of inflammatory bowel disease. FUNDING: Kirsten og Freddy Johansens Fond and Nordsjællands Hospital Forskningsråd.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations162
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatologyMême sujetInflammatory Bowel DiseaseTravaux en français237 207