MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005766885 · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30012-1

Health-care costs of inflammatory bowel disease in a pan-European, community-based, inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up: a population-based study

2020· article· en· W3005766885 on OpenAlexaff
Johan Burisch, Hillel Vardi, Doron Schwartz, Michael Friger, Gediminas Kiudelis, Juozas Kupčinskas, Mathurin Fuméry, Corinne Gower‐Rousseau, Péter L. Lakatos, R. D’Incà, Alessandro Sartini, Daniela Valpiani, M. Giannotta, Naila Arebi, Dana Duricova, Martin Bortlík, Stefania Chetcuti Zammit, Pierre Ellul, Natalia Pedersen, Jens Kjeldsen, Jóngerð Midjord, Kári Rubek Nielsen, Karina Winther Andersen, Vibeke Andersen, Konstantinos H. Katsanos, Dimitrios Christodoulou, Viktor Domislović, Željko Krznarić, Shaji Sebastian, Pia Oksanen, Pekka Collin, Luísa Leite Barros, Fernando Magro, Riina Salupere, Hendrika Adriana Linda Kievit, Adrian Goldiș, Ioannis Kaimakliotis, Jens F Dahlerup, Carl Eriksson, Jonas Halfvarson, Alberto Fernández, Vicent Hernandez, Svetlana Turcan, Elena Belousova, Ebbe Langholz, Pia Munkholm, Selwyn Odes, Nikša Turk, Silvija Čuković‐Čavka, Anastasia Nicolaou, Milan Lukáš, Olga Shonová, Birgitte Blichfeldt, Dorte Marker, Katrine Carlsen, Petra Weimers, Clays Aalykke, Karen Kudsk, Ida Vind, Niels Thorsgaard, Alexandros Skamnelos, Dimitrios Politis, Zsuzsanna Végh, Peterne Demenyi, Szabina Nemethne Kramli, Giualia Dal Piaz, A. Santini, Giulia Girardin, Limas Kupčinskas, Laimas Jonaitis, Irena Valantienė, Romanas Zykus, Rūta Kučinskienė, Daniela Lazăr, Inna Nikulina, Luisa de Castro, Juan-Ramon Pineda, Santos Pereira, J Martínez-Cadilla, L Sanromán, Montserrat Figueira, D. Martínez Ares, J I Rodríguez-Prada, Amalia Carmona, Carlos González-Portela, Ulla-Britt Widen, Sally Myers, Katherine M. Ashton, Emma Whitehead

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsDr. Falk PharmaFerring PharmaceuticalsShireMeso Scale DiagnosticsAbbVieTakeda Pharmaceutical CompanyNovartisPfizer
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineCohortCohort studyHealth careDiseaseEnvironmental healthFamily medicineGerontologyDemographyInternal medicineEconomic growthEconomicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) places a significant burden on health-care systems because of its chronicity and need for expensive therapies and surgery. With increasing use of biological therapies, contemporary data on IBD health-care costs are important for those responsible for allocating resources in Europe. To our knowledge, no prospective long-term analysis of the health-care costs of patients with IBD in the era of biologicals has been done in Europe. We aimed to investigate cost profiles of a pan-European, community-based inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: The Epi-IBD cohort is a community-based, prospective inception cohort of unselected patients with IBD diagnosed in 2010 at centres in 20 European countries plus Israel. Incident patients who were diagnosed with IBD according to the Copenhagen Diagnostic Criteria between Jan 1, and Dec 31, 2010, and were aged 15 years or older the time of diagnosis were prospectively included. Data on clinical characteristics and direct costs (investigations and outpatient visits, blood tests, treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries) were collected prospectively using electronic case-report forms. Patient-level costs incorporated procedures leading to the initial diagnosis of IBD and costs of IBD management during the 5-year follow-up period. Costs incurred by comorbidities and unrelated to IBD were excluded. We grouped direct costs into the following five categories: investigations (including outpatient visits and blood tests), conventional medical treatment, biological therapy, hospitalisation, and surgery. FINDINGS: The study population consisted of 1289 patients with IBD, with 1073 (83%) patients from western Europe and 216 (17%) from eastern Europe. 488 (38%) patients had Crohn's disease, 717 (56%) had ulcerative colitis, and 84 (6%) had IBD unclassified. The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up for patients with IBD was €2609 (SD 7389; median €446 [IQR 164-1849]). The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up was €3542 (8058; median €717 [214-3512]) for patients with Crohn's disease, €2088 (7058; median €408 [133-1161]) for patients with ulcerative colitis, and €1609 (5010; median €415 [92-1228]) for patients with IBD unclassified (p<0·0001). Costs were highest in the first year and then decreased significantly during follow-up. Hospitalisations and diagnostic procedures accounted for more than 50% of costs during the first year. However, in subsequent years there was a steady increase in expenditure on biologicals, which accounted for 73% of costs in Crohn's disease and 48% in ulcerative colitis, in year 5. The mean annual cost per patient-year for biologicals was €866 (SD 3056). The mean yearly costs of biological therapy were higher in patients with Crohn's disease (€1782 [SD 4370]) than in patients with ulcerative colitis (€286 [1427]) or IBD unclassified (€521 [2807]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Overall direct expenditure on health care decreased over a 5-year follow-up period. This period was characterised by increasing expenditure on biologicals and decreasing expenditure on conventional medical treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries. In light of the expenditures associated with biological therapy, cost-effective treatment strategies are needed to reduce the economic burden of inflammatory bowel disease. FUNDING: Kirsten og Freddy Johansens Fond and Nordsjællands Hospital Forskningsråd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations162
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207