MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3007089033 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2019.11.017

Commentary: It's a long road ahead

2020· editorial· en· W3007089033 sur OpenAlexaff
Pierre‐Luc Bernier

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueWilliams Syndrome Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSupravalvular aortic stenosisWilliams syndromeElastinMedicineAscending aortaCardiologyAortaStenosisInternal medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessagePediatric surgical correction of Williams–Beuren syndrome–associated supravalvular aortic stenosis is not a definitive treatment. It is a long road to adulthood, and long-term follow-up is necessary.See Article page 79. Pediatric surgical correction of Williams–Beuren syndrome–associated supravalvular aortic stenosis is not a definitive treatment. It is a long road to adulthood, and long-term follow-up is necessary. See Article page 79. Williams–Beuren syndrome is a genetic abnormality caused by the deletion of multiple genes from the region q11.23 of chromosome 7. This impacts on multiple organ systems. Importantly, the gene ELN coding for elastin is deleted, which results in a lack of elastin. This is then associated with connective tissue abnormalities and cardiovascular disease, such as supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS) and supravalvular pulmonary stenosis. Patients with SVAS are often treated surgically during childhood. Various techniques exist, but commonly a patch angioplasty of the aortic root, sinotubular junction and ascending aorta is performed. SVAS can have a variable presentation and evolution. Type I presents as a discrete form and type II often presents as a more diffuse form that also involves the aortic arch. The exact incidence of the discreet and diffuse forms of the disease is unknown. It is important to note that aortic valve pathology may be present in approximately one half of patients with SVAS. Various studies have reported the need for reoperation after surgical repair of SVAS during childhood in a range of 0% to 32%. The most common indication for late reintervention appears to be the treatment of progressive aortic valve disease.1Deo S.V. Burkhart H.M. Dearani J.A. Schaff H.V. Supravalvar aortic stenosis: current surgical approaches and outcomes.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013; 11: 879-890Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar In the paper “Late Reoperation After Proximal Repair of Supravalvar Stenosis for Diffuse Form of Williams-Beuren Syndrome,” Katahira and colleagues2Katahira S. Sugimura Y. Lichtenberg A. Akhyari P. Late reoperation after proximal repair of supravalvar stenosis for diffuse form of Williams-Beuren syndrome.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 3: 79-81Google Scholar describe the case of a patient presenting at a relatively advanced age with aortic valve disease, recurrence of supravalvular aortic stenosis, and proximal arch obstruction. The authors describe their technique for replacement of the diseased aortic valve, the stenotic ascending aorta, and proximal aortic arch. A video summarizing and illustrating the procedure quite effectively is included in the report. This report demonstrates the complexity of SVAS associated with Williams–Beuren syndrome. We often hope to provide definitive treatments with repair of SVAS in the childhood period. However, reports like this are clear evidence that the natural history of genetic diseases such as Williams–Beuren syndrome is not entirely understood nor predictable. Consequently, the optimal treatment remains unknown. As congenital cardiac surgeons treating our young patients, we often hope for complete cures, but temporary treatments are what we truly offer. Undoubtedly, it's a long road ahead for children with Williams–Beuren syndrome. Late reoperation after proximal repair of supravalvular stenosis for diffuse form of Williams–Beuren syndromeJTCVS TechniquesVol. 3PreviewWilliams–Beuren syndrome is associated with various pathologies caused by a genetic mutation affecting elastin genes on chromosome 7. Elastin is a protein that plays an important role in cardiovascular tissues and is often associated with supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS). In this case, a mid-aged patient with previous valvuloplasty and aortic root enlargement using the Doty technique in the childhood presented with severe combined aortic valve disease and panaortic stenosis beginning at the proximal ascending aorta and further complicated by a proximal stenosis of the brachiocephalic artery. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,119
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,359
Écart entre enseignants0,320 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJTCVS TechniquesMême sujetWilliams Syndrome ResearchTravaux en français237 207