MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3007149723 · doi:10.1101/2020.02.19.20025387

Effectiveness of control strategies for Coronavirus Disease 2019: a SEIR dynamic modeling study

2020· preprint· en· W3007149723 sur OpenAlexaff
Jinhua Pan, Ye Yao, Zhixi Liu, Mengying Li, Ying Wang, Weizhen Dong, Haidong Kan, Weibing Wang

Notice bibliographique

RevuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineMathematics
ThématiqueCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Mots-clésAsymptomaticCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)ChinaSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Basic reproduction numberDemographyGeographyEstimation2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedicineDiseaseOutbreakEnvironmental healthVirologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicinePopulation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Since its first case’s occurrence in Wuhan, China, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading rapidly to other provinces and neighboring countries. A series of intervention strategies have been implemented, but didn’t stop its spread. Methods Two mathematical models have been developed to simulate the current epidemic situation in the city of Wuhan and in other parts of China. Special considerations were given to the mobility of people for the estimation and forecast the number of asymptomatic infections, symptomatic infections, and the infections of super-spreading events (I sse ). Findings The basic reproductive number (R 0 ) was calculated for the period between 18 January 2020 and 16 February 2020: R 0 declined from 5.75 to 1.69 in Wuhan and from 6.22 to 1.67 in the entire country (not including the Wuhan area). At the same time, Wuhan is estimated to observe a peak in the number of confirmed cases around 6 February 2020. The number of infected individuals in the entire country (not including the Wuhan area) peaked around February 3. The results also show that the peak of new asymptomatic cases per day in Wuhan occurred on February 6, and the peak of new symptomatic infections have occurred on February 3. Concurrently, while the number of confirmed cases nationwide would continue to decline, the number of real-time COVID-19 inpatients in Wuhan has reached a peak of 13,030 on February 14 before it decreases. The model further shows that the COVID-19 cases will gradually wane by the end of April 2020, both in Wuhan and the other parts of China. The number of confirmed cases would reach the single digit on March 27 in Wuhan and March 19 in the entire country. The five cities with top risk index in China with the exclusion of Wuhan are: Huanggang, Xiaogan, Jingzhou, Chongqing, and Xiangyang city. Interpretations Although the national peak time has been reached, a significant proportion of asymptomatic patients and the infections of super-spreading events (I sse ) still exist in the population, indicating the potential difficulty for the prevention and control of the disease. As the Return-to-Work tide is approaching and upgrading, further measures (e.g., escalatory quarantine, mask wearing when going out, and sit apart when taking vehicles) will be particularly crucial to stop the COVID-19 in other cities outside of Wuhan. What was already known about the topic concerned Currently, a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is thought to have emerged into the human population in Wuhan, and cases have been identified in neighboring provinces and other countries. In existing epidemiological studies, the basic reproduction number (R 0 ) of the virus were estimated between 1.4 and 5. Besides, it is of crucial importance to evaluate and improve different intervention strategies which have already implemented. What new knowledge the manuscript contributes In this study, two mathematical models were established to simulate the current epidemic situation and predict the future trend of the COVID-19. We found that with the implementation of different policies, R 0 continued to decline over time and the number of confirmed cases in Wuhan will peak on around February 6. Also, we estimated and forecast the number of asymptomatic infections, symptomatic infections, and infections of super-spreading events caused by the COVID-19 and the risk index of different cities. Implications of all the available evidence Our research has important practical implications for public health policy makers. Although the current prevention and control measures have made some significant inroads into controlling the epidemic, complete control has not yet been achieved. We recommend that self-isolation at home be strictly observed for a period of time in the future. Furthermore, our estimation of the number of asymptomatic people, super spreading and real-time inpatients would provide basis guidance for the hospital to arrange beds accordingly.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,565
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,269
Tête enseignante GPT0,463
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations21
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuemedRxivMême sujetCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesTravaux en français237 207