Notice bibliographique
Résumé
suggesting the importance of folklore to economists.Yet folklore and economics as a subfield has largely remained unarticulated, in part because of the constructs and institutional histories of each field.At this moment, trade, technology, and geopolitics have led to a rapid increase in the global spread of cultural products, including media, knowledge, objects, and folkways.Accompanying that globalization have come fears, realized and not, of cultural appropriation, neocolonialism, and loss.Culture operates as a resource and a currency in the global marketplace.This movement of people and forms necessitates a new textual consideration of how folklore and economics interweave.Here, we hope to explore how the marketplace and folklore itself have always been integrally linked in ways both productive and subversive, in theory and on the ground, and what that means at this global, cultural, and economic moment.In order to create a more concise disciplinary history of folklore and economics and to provide the institutional background against which the current work is set, in the sections that follow, this introduction offers a tracing of the genealogy that has helped formed the field of folklore and economics.Folklorists' ideas about the relationship between folklore and economics have tended to occur along three primary trajectories.First, at the macrolevel, folklorists have relied on socioeconomic status as a marker of folk status as a way to bound or propel the field, and, in a Marxist turn, they have considered the role of class in the production of folklore, particularly through labor lore.Second, scholars have invoked microlevel understandings of commodity and commodification, particularly in the study of material culture.This perspective has helped folklorists assess the relationship between folk artists, folklorists, and audiences and how practices and art forms may be influenced by consumers.A third, more theoretical but still microeconomic line of thought, has built on Mikhail Bakhtin's conceptualization of the marketplace as a center of village life (1965).In the marketplace, critical inversions of social status become possible and folk performance can take place.Each of these trajectories has influenced how folklorists have constructed the folk both in relation and opposition to the marketplace, but they tell a partial story.Like the stage set of a play, these trajectories provide a background against which the chapters that follow are set, and like a stage set, they both give context to these discussions and influence how we understand them.But also like a stage set, these three specific trajectories are offered as not a whole story but a backdrop, an evocation of how economics and folklore have been explored by those before.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».