A225 AGE OF DIAGNOSIS DOES NOT IMPACT LIKELIHOOD OF EXPERIENCING POOR IBD-RELATED OUTCOMES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Aims The relationship between the age of diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and adverse disease outcomes has not been well defined. This study aims to determine whether an early age of diagnosis is associated with worse disease outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective study of IBD patients seen at McMaster University Medical Centre, in Hamilton, ON, Canada from 2012 to 2018. Patients were classified as having poor outcomes if they had any of the following: (1) two or more bowel resections since diagnosis; (2) two or more hospitalizations for disease exacerbation since diagnosis; or (3) more than three months of corticosteroid use within 24 months of diagnosis. Prior knowledge in combination with forward selection was used to develop a multivariate logistic regression model and identify predictors of poor IBD outcomes. The variables used in the forward selection model included age at diagnosis (less than vs. greater than 25), smoking status, sex, disease duration, and type of IBD. Results A total of 617 IBD patients were included in the analysis, of which 356 (57.7%) had Crohn’s disease, 234 (37.9%) had ulcerative colitis, and 27 (4.4%) had IBD-U. The median age at diagnosis was 25 (interquartile range (IQR) 17–37). Median disease duration was 16 years (IQR 11–24). A univariate regression analysis indicated that the odds ratio (OR) of poor outcomes was found to be 0.55 (0.38 - 0.79) for those ≥25 years of age compared to to those <25. In the multivariate regression analysis (Table 1), all of disease duration, smoking status, and IBD type were found to have a significant association with having poor outcomes. Each year of disease duration was associated with an increase in odds of poor outcomes (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.09). Active smokers had increased odds of poor outcomes compared to past or never smokers (OR 5.01, 95% CI 1.71–14.68). Patients with ulcerative colitis were less likely to experience poor outcomes compared to Crohn’s disease patients (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24–0.57). Age of diagnosis was no longer found to have a significant association with poor outcomes, once adjusted for other co-variates (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47–1.15). Conclusions Age of diagnosis was not found to have a relationship with occurrence of poor IBD outcomes, after adjustment for co-variates. However, patients with increased disease duration, active smoking status, and Crohn’s disease (compared to UC) were found to have increased odds of poor IBD-related outcomes. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».