MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3007858509 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.224

A225 AGE OF DIAGNOSIS DOES NOT IMPACT LIKELIHOOD OF EXPERIENCING POOR IBD-RELATED OUTCOMES

2020· article· en· W3007858509 on OpenAlexaffabout
Y Piracha, Seleman Reza, M Fadida, R Chattha, M Moradshahi, N Naddaf Dezfooli, Z Chattha, Gagan Deep Singh Sambhi, Usha Chauhan, Smita Halder, John K. Marshall, Neeraj Narula

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeInflammatory bowel diseaseLogistic regressionUlcerative colitisInternal medicineDiseaseOdds ratioMultivariate analysisExacerbationUnivariate analysisCrohn's diseaseRetrospective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims The relationship between the age of diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and adverse disease outcomes has not been well defined. This study aims to determine whether an early age of diagnosis is associated with worse disease outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective study of IBD patients seen at McMaster University Medical Centre, in Hamilton, ON, Canada from 2012 to 2018. Patients were classified as having poor outcomes if they had any of the following: (1) two or more bowel resections since diagnosis; (2) two or more hospitalizations for disease exacerbation since diagnosis; or (3) more than three months of corticosteroid use within 24 months of diagnosis. Prior knowledge in combination with forward selection was used to develop a multivariate logistic regression model and identify predictors of poor IBD outcomes. The variables used in the forward selection model included age at diagnosis (less than vs. greater than 25), smoking status, sex, disease duration, and type of IBD. Results A total of 617 IBD patients were included in the analysis, of which 356 (57.7%) had Crohn’s disease, 234 (37.9%) had ulcerative colitis, and 27 (4.4%) had IBD-U. The median age at diagnosis was 25 (interquartile range (IQR) 17–37). Median disease duration was 16 years (IQR 11–24). A univariate regression analysis indicated that the odds ratio (OR) of poor outcomes was found to be 0.55 (0.38 - 0.79) for those ≥25 years of age compared to to those <25. In the multivariate regression analysis (Table 1), all of disease duration, smoking status, and IBD type were found to have a significant association with having poor outcomes. Each year of disease duration was associated with an increase in odds of poor outcomes (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.09). Active smokers had increased odds of poor outcomes compared to past or never smokers (OR 5.01, 95% CI 1.71–14.68). Patients with ulcerative colitis were less likely to experience poor outcomes compared to Crohn’s disease patients (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24–0.57). Age of diagnosis was no longer found to have a significant association with poor outcomes, once adjusted for other co-variates (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47–1.15). Conclusions Age of diagnosis was not found to have a relationship with occurrence of poor IBD outcomes, after adjustment for co-variates. However, patients with increased disease duration, active smoking status, and Crohn’s disease (compared to UC) were found to have increased odds of poor IBD-related outcomes. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→