Abstract B001: Safety and efficacy of ZW25, a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic HER2-expressing gastroesophageal cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Up to 30% of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) overexpress HER2. ZW25 is a novel bispecific antibody that targets HER2 domains ECD2 and ECD4, resulting in multiple differentiated and unique mechanisms of action, including increased antibody binding density and improved receptor internalization and downregulation relative to trastuzumab. In an ongoing phase 1 trial (ZWI-ZW25-101; NCT02892123), single-agent ZW25 was well tolerated and showed promising anti-tumor activity across HER2-expressing solid tumors. This abstract presents data for GEA patients treated with ZW25 in combination with chemotherapy in Study ZWI-ZW25-101. Methods Eligible patients had HER2-expressing (IHC 3+, IHC 2+/FISH+, or IHC 2+/FISH-) GEA and had disease progression after 1–3 lines of prior chemotherapy for advanced and/or metastatic disease. Fresh or archived tumor tissue was required for central review of HER2 status, although patients could be enrolled based on local results. Patients received ZW25 in combination with paclitaxel or capecitabine. Evaluations included standard safety assessments, tumor re-staging (Q8W by RECIST 1.1), and assessment of peak/trough pharmacokinetic (PK) levels during each cycle. Results To date, 14 patients have been enrolled, with safety and efficacy data available for 11. ZW25 was administered in combination with paclitaxel (n=5) or capecitabine (n=6). The median age was 62 yrs (range, 26-80). The median number of prior anti-cancer regimens was 3 and the median number of prior HER2-targeted therapies was 1. Six patients (55%) were HER2 IHC3+ or IHC2+ and FISH+ per central review. The most common adverse events (AEs) considered related to ZW25 or ZW25 and chemotherapy were diarrhea (n=5; 45%), fatigue (n=3; 27%), and nausea (n=3; 27%); the majority of events were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 or higher events considered related to ZW25 or ZW25 and chemotherapy occurred in 3 patients (27%), including fatigue, hypokalemia, and neutropenia (n=1 each). One additional patient experienced a Grade 5 serious adverse event of pneumonitis, reported as related to the combination of ZW25 and paclitaxel. This patient had been previously treated with trastuzumab, cisplatin, and capecitabine; pembrolizumab and margetuximab; and most recently DS8201, and had asymptomatic interstitial lung disease at study entry. A total of 9/11 patients (82%) had measurable disease and 8/9 (89%) were response-evaluable. The objective response rate was 63% (95% CI: 25, 92) (5/8 patients; all partial responses, with 4 confirmed to date) and the disease control rate was 75% (6/8 patients). Responses were seen in patients with FISH+ and FISH- disease, as well as in combination with either paclitaxel or capecitabine. Patients have received between 1 and 12 cycles of treatment and 4 patients remain on treatment. PK data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions The combination of ZW25 with chemotherapy was generally well tolerated in heavily pre-treated patients with HER2 high- and low-expressing GEA and the preliminary anti-tumor activity is promising. Further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of ZW25 in combination with standard of care chemotherapy regimens has been initiated in frontline GEA (ZW25-201; NCT03929666). Citation Format: Funda Meric-Bernstam, Jorge Chaves, Do-Youn Oh, Jeeyun Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang, Erika Hamilton, Jose Mayordomo, Melody Cobleigh, Christos Vaklavas, Elena Elimova, Jaffer Ajani, Jordi Rodon, Gerry Rowse, Todd Gray, Rose Lai, Diana Hanna. Safety and efficacy of ZW25, a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic HER2-expressing gastroesophageal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B001. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-B001
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».