Safety and Efficacy of 48 Weeks REP 2139 or REP 2165, Tenofovir Disoproxil, and Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection Naïve to Nucleos(t)ide Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nucleic acid polymers (NAPs) inhibit assembly and secretion of hepatitis B virus (HBV) subviral particles. We performed an open-label, phase 2 study of the safety and efficacy of the NAPs REP 2139 or REP 2165 combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and pegylated interferon alfa-2a (pegIFN) in patients with chronic HBV infection who were negative for hepatitis B e antigen. METHODS: Following 24 weeks TDF therapy, 40 patients were randomly assigned to groups that received 48 weeks of experimental therapy (TDF + pegIFN + REP 2139-Mg or REP 2165-Mg) or 24 weeks of control therapy (TDF + pegIFN) followed by 48 weeks of experimental therapy. Patients were then followed for a treatment-free period of 48 weeks. Primary outcomes were the safety and tolerability of REP 2139-Mg or REP 2165-Mg in combination with TDF + pegIFN compared with TDF + pegIFN alone through the first 48 weeks of therapy and subsequently throughout 48 weeks of NAP-based combination therapy (treatment weeks 24-72 in the experimental group and weeks 48-96 in the control group). Secondary outcomes were reductions in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in control and experimental groups over the first 48 weeks of the study and throughout 48 weeks of combination therapy and virologic control (HBsAg positive, HBV DNA below 2000 IU/mL, normal level of alanine aminotransferase) or functional cure (HBsAg below 0.05 IU/mL, HBV DNA target not detected, normal level of alanine aminotransferase) after removal of all therapy. RESULTS: Levels of HBsAg, anti-HBs, and HBV DNA did not differ significantly between the groups given REP 2139 vs REP 2165. PegIFN-induced thrombocytopenia (P = .299 vs controls) and neutropenia (P = .112 vs controls) were unaffected by NAPs (REP 2139 vs REP 2165). Increases in levels of transaminases were significantly more frequent (P < .001 vs controls) and greater (P = .002 vs controls) in the NAP groups (but did not produce symptoms), correlated with initial decrease in HBsAg, and normalized during therapy and follow-up. During the first 24 weeks of TDF and pegIFN administration, significantly higher proportions of patients in NAP groups had decreases in HBsAg to below 1 IU/mL (P < .001 vs control) and HBsAg seroconversion (P = .046 vs control). At the time patients completed the TDF + pegIFN + NAP regimen, HBsAg levels were 0.05 IU/mL or lower in 24/40 participants (all with seroconversion up to 233,055 mIU/mL). During 48 weeks of treatment-free follow-up, virologic control persisted in 13 of 40 participants (2 lost to follow-up after 24 weeks), whereas functional cure persisted in 14 of 40 participants (all completing 48 weeks of follow-up) with persistent HBsAg seroconversion. One participant had a viral rebound during follow-up with hepatic decompensation and was placed on TDF therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 2 randomized trial, we found that addition of NAPs to TDF + pegIFN did not alter tolerability and significantly increased rates of HBsAg loss and HBsAg seroconversion during therapy and functional cure after therapy. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02565719.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».