Notice bibliographique
Résumé
MONEY is a thing, an abstraction, and a symbol. According to general semantics, which is concerned with use of symbols, we can describe as any of the above, depending on our purpose. This story involves a curious practice in my family. In certain circumstances, our money was the stone. When was a boy, we moved from Massachusetts to the Bahamas. sailed among the islands and built a home on wild and remote windblown scrub beside the sea. To help provide materials, my brothers and carried large stones from the ocean beach up a sand dune to the building In burning sun and sweltering humidity, hauling heavy stones was hard and sweaty toil. The dune was steep, we sank to our ankles in sand, and sometimes slid down a step for each step up. worked with enthusiasm, as we vied for who could carry the heaviest stone. Arriving at the top of the ridge, gasping with exertion, tired but gratified, we threw down our stones and faced the ocean to savor the cooling breeze. Then we ran down the dune for another load. Later, our labor done, we hacked open green coconuts, collapsed in the shade of a palm tree and drank the sweet coconut juice. Overhead, palm fronds click-click-clicked in the wind. came to dread what had been fun. also enjoyed spasms of hate for the source of our misery--our father. The joy of hating was compromised by guilt. An ardent artist who reveled in his genius for eccentric inventions, my father devised a unique form of punishment for boys who defied his paternal authority: the stone can't recall what crime led to this newfangled form of retribution or who committed it. Perhaps it was a minor mutiny by my teenage brother Bill. As eldest, he often bore the brunt of my father's efforts to discipline his unruly crew. The short drama probably went like this: Father: Do what say. Son: Do it yourself. Father: That's a one-stone fine. Son (incredulously): What? Father (sternly): Go to the ocean beach and carry one of those big stones up to the house site. Son (stubbornly): I won't. Father (with satisfaction): You're fined another two stones! My father seemed pleased with his brainchild. imagine it appealed to his appetite for getting something for nothing. He needed stones for building our house. On this isolated island, materials and labor were hard to get. As he studied our reactions, his wild hair was splayed out liked seaweed in a hurricane, and a foxy smile lurked behind his graying beard. None of us anticipated the tortuous consequences of my father's magisterial decree. My father loved to boast, We live on a desert island. Even after grew up, took exception to this assertion. Our island wasn't absolutely deserted. Near us lived the lighthouse family, although there was no one else for miles. The island also had several faraway settlements, one of which we sailed to for food, supplies, and mail. Admittedly, we lived on a neck of land called Little Harbour that was separated from the nearest habitation by almost impenetrable jungle and mangrove swamp, and it took nearly a day to sail to the village where we obtained basic necessities. However, craved verbal certainty. knew my father was bending the truth. A sculptor of the romantic persuasion, my father created his life as if he were sculpting his own personal work of art. He lived, for the most part happily, in a world of his own, perhaps a useful strategy when you consider the negative worlds some want us to embrace. However, the consequences of his choices sometimes upset wife and children, especially when his artistic renderings approached the surreal. My father grew up in the early 1900s in the city of Toronto and in the wilds of Midwestern Canada. His father homesteaded land in Alberta that had never seen the plow. The winters were bitterly cold. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».