MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3009540471 · doi:10.25302/03.2020.ad.140819519

A Training Program on Pain Coping Skills for African Americans With Hip or Knee Arthritis

2020· report· en· W3009540471 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelli D. Allen, Tamara J. Somers, Lisa C. Campbell, Liubov Arbeeva, Cynthia J. Coffman, Crystal N Cene, Eugene Ž. Oddone, Francis J. Keefe

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typereport
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHip painKnee painPhysical therapyCoping (psychology)ArthritisTraining (meteorology)MedicinePsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationClinical psychologyOsteoarthritisAlternative medicineGeographyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This research project is in progress. PCORI will post its findings here within 90 days after our final review is complete. In the meantime, results have been published in peer-reviewed journals, as listed below. Background and Significance: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of pain and disability. African Americans have a greater burden of OA. In this demographic group, compared with Caucasians, OA is more common and associated with more severe pain and activity limitations. Existing research suggests that a program called pain Coping Skills Training (CST) has strong potential for helping African Americans with OA reduce their symptoms. However, important limitations remain about what is known in this research, which limits putting CST into practice. First, there is a need to incorporate the perspectives of African Americans with OA, as well as other key stakeholders, into this program; this is necessary to ensure that the program is culturally relevant and that it can be successfully used in a variety of clinical and community settings. Second, there is still a need for a study that will test the effectiveness of pain CST, specifically among African Americans with OA, in “real-world” settings. Therefore, the objective of this project is to examine the effectiveness of a culturally enhanced pain CST program among African Americans with OA. Study Aims: This project has three specific aims: (1) to engage African-American patients with OA, their support partners, healthcare providers, clinic administrators, and public health representatives in a process of evaluating and enhancing a pain CST program for culturally appropriate content and dissemination potential; (2) to examine the effectiveness of a 12-session, culturally enhanced, telephone-based pain CST program among African Americans with hip or knee OA; and (3) to examine whether individual patient characteristics are associated with different levels of improvement in the CST program. The long-term objective of this research is to develop and disseminate an evidence-based pain CST intervention among African Americans with OA to reduce disparities in outcomes. Study Description: After the incorporation of stakeholder perspectives into the pain CST program, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial. We will enroll 248 African Americans with hip or knee OA. They will be randomized into two groups. One group will take part in a two-week pain CST intervention. The other group will be a “wait list” that receives the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. All study participants will be able to continue any other usual medical care for their OA during the study period. The pain CST intervention includes 12 individual sessions with a study counselor, delivered via telephone to enhance access and reach. The sessions include the following: general information about why pain CST is important, training in specific pain coping skills (such as progressive muscle relaxation, communication, imagery, and activity pacing), and guided practice with each skill. The CST program will also include information about other behaviors important for OA, such as physical activity and weight management. Outcomes: The main study outcome will be the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Other outcomes will include the WOMAC function subscale, coping strategies questionnaire, arthritis self-efficacy scale, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and patient global impression of change. These measures were selected based on stakeholder input and prior research that showed these outcomes as important to patients with OA. Statistical models will be used to compare outcomes between the two study groups at each time point: baseline, 12 weeks (after completion of the initial CST intervention), and 36 weeks (about 6 months after intervention completion). We will also assess whether there are different levels of improvement in outcomes of the CST intervention, based on participant characteristics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,049

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,070
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→