A Training Program on Pain Coping Skills for African Americans With Hip or Knee Arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research project is in progress. PCORI will post its findings here within 90 days after our final review is complete. In the meantime, results have been published in peer-reviewed journals, as listed below. Background and Significance: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of pain and disability. African Americans have a greater burden of OA. In this demographic group, compared with Caucasians, OA is more common and associated with more severe pain and activity limitations. Existing research suggests that a program called pain Coping Skills Training (CST) has strong potential for helping African Americans with OA reduce their symptoms. However, important limitations remain about what is known in this research, which limits putting CST into practice. First, there is a need to incorporate the perspectives of African Americans with OA, as well as other key stakeholders, into this program; this is necessary to ensure that the program is culturally relevant and that it can be successfully used in a variety of clinical and community settings. Second, there is still a need for a study that will test the effectiveness of pain CST, specifically among African Americans with OA, in “real-world” settings. Therefore, the objective of this project is to examine the effectiveness of a culturally enhanced pain CST program among African Americans with OA. Study Aims: This project has three specific aims: (1) to engage African-American patients with OA, their support partners, healthcare providers, clinic administrators, and public health representatives in a process of evaluating and enhancing a pain CST program for culturally appropriate content and dissemination potential; (2) to examine the effectiveness of a 12-session, culturally enhanced, telephone-based pain CST program among African Americans with hip or knee OA; and (3) to examine whether individual patient characteristics are associated with different levels of improvement in the CST program. The long-term objective of this research is to develop and disseminate an evidence-based pain CST intervention among African Americans with OA to reduce disparities in outcomes. Study Description: After the incorporation of stakeholder perspectives into the pain CST program, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial. We will enroll 248 African Americans with hip or knee OA. They will be randomized into two groups. One group will take part in a two-week pain CST intervention. The other group will be a “wait list” that receives the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. All study participants will be able to continue any other usual medical care for their OA during the study period. The pain CST intervention includes 12 individual sessions with a study counselor, delivered via telephone to enhance access and reach. The sessions include the following: general information about why pain CST is important, training in specific pain coping skills (such as progressive muscle relaxation, communication, imagery, and activity pacing), and guided practice with each skill. The CST program will also include information about other behaviors important for OA, such as physical activity and weight management. Outcomes: The main study outcome will be the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Other outcomes will include the WOMAC function subscale, coping strategies questionnaire, arthritis self-efficacy scale, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and patient global impression of change. These measures were selected based on stakeholder input and prior research that showed these outcomes as important to patients with OA. Statistical models will be used to compare outcomes between the two study groups at each time point: baseline, 12 weeks (after completion of the initial CST intervention), and 36 weeks (about 6 months after intervention completion). We will also assess whether there are different levels of improvement in outcomes of the CST intervention, based on participant characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".