MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3013847597 · doi:10.221751/rmc2018.060

Incorporation of β-Glucans in Meat Emulsions through Modeling Systems

2018· article· en· W3013847597 sur OpenAlex
S. M. Vasquez Mejia, Alícia de Francisco, Pedro Luiz Manique Barreto, César Damian, André Wüst Zibetti, Héctor Suárez Mahecha, B. M. Bohrer

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueMeat and Muscle Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueMeat and Animal Product Quality
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFood scienceSyneresisEmulsionChemistryIngredientLean meatCarrageenanStarchFiberMathematicsBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ObjectivesRecent trends suggest novel ingredients can be added to meat products to achieve lower fat while incorporating functional compounds such as soluble fiber into the product. Incorporation of β-glucans (βG) at high quantities into meat products is an opportunity to provide recommended daily soluble fiber intake (3 g/d). This work aimed to evaluate the effects of the incorporation of βG in meat emulsions with modeling systems using carrageenan (C) and starch (S) as supplemental ingredients. Materials and MethodsModeling systems were accomplished with the incorporation of βG, C, and S in beef emulsions using an experimental design by “Design for constrained surfaces and mixtures”. The inclusion level of βG were selected based on daily intake requirements of this fiber (FDA recommendation of 3 g/d). Meat emulsions were manufactured with a standard formulation consisting of 59.2% lean beef, 10% olive oil, 24.4% water, 2% sodium chloride, 0.35% sodium polyphosphate, and 0.01% sodium nitrate. The emulsions were then combined with βG, C, and S according to 14 treatments generated by the software. Subsequently, the emulsions were packaged in collagen casings and vacuum sealed, weighed, and refrigerated at 4 ± 1°C until further analysis was conducted. Cooking loss (%), instrumental color, and textural profile analysis (TPA) were analyzed for the determination of optimal emulsion characteristics. Fitting response value was conducted using linear, quadratic, and cubic models. The results were expressed as the mean of 3 independent replicates and ANOVA was used to evaluate the statistical significance (P < 0.05) of each model equation. Then, the best mathematical models to describe cooking loss, instrumental color, and TPA were selected. The content of βG, TPA parameters, color, and microstructure were performed on the optimized emulsion to determine desirability. ResultsThe cubic models were best at describing cooking loss, instrumental color, and TPA parameters, with the lone exception of springiness. Emulsions with greater levels of βG and S had less cooking loss (< 1%), intermediate L* values (between 54 and 62 units), and greater hardness, cohesiveness, and springiness values compared with emulsions with lower levels of βG and S. The βG/S interaction showed a synergistic effect for cooking loss, while the use of C was eliminated during the optimization. The optimized emulsion contained 3.13 ± 0.11% βG, which could meet the daily intake levels of βG recommendations. Cooking loss, lightness (L*), and cohesiveness presented values similar or close to those expected by the optimization. On the other hand, hardness of the optimized emulsion was greater than planned and springiness decreased, possibly because the water was immobilized. Finally, the optimized emulsion presented a greater degree of aggregation, more compact and homogeneous structure with smaller pore size indicating the complete incorporation of hydrocolloids in the protein matrix. ConclusionAddition of βG and its mixtures with C and S decreased cooking loss and increased lightness (L*). Homogeneous mixtures were created with greater degree of aggregation, without requiring the binding capability of C. The optimization allowed for manufacturing of emulsions with lesser quantities of S and greater quantities of βG while achieving appropriate technological characteristics with the exception of hardness, which was greater in the optimized emulsion.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,867
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,425

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,081
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle