MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3014614827 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2020.03.011

Printing of Three-Dimensional Heart Models—Is It Worth the Expense?

2020· letter· en· W3014614827 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert H. Anderson, Saurabh Kumar Gupta

Notice bibliographique

RevueCJC Open · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueAnatomy and Medical Technology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)Relevance (law)MedicineHealth careFamily medicineMedical educationPolitical scienceHistoryLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In this issue of the Canadian Journal of Cardiology Open, Illmann et al.,1Illmann C.F. Hosking M. Harris K.C. Utility and access to 3D printing in the context of congenital heart disease: an international physician survey study.Can J Cardiol. 2020; 2: 207-213Google Scholar from BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, report their results of a survey carried out with the Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association and the Congenital Cardiac Interventional Study Consortium. As such, it is a relatively small study, but the results probably reflect the current “state of play” with regard to the appreciation of the burgeoning technique. For example, the authors found that those working in centers in the United States were more than 5 times more likely to have access to the necessary technology than those working in Canada. Financial constraints were identified as the barrier to access for half of those responding to the particular question on that topic. These results regarding the financial burden almost certainly represent the situation in other continents, particularly for those still working in the so-called Third World. This is of relevance when the whole world is facing the problem of increasing costs of health care. The conclusions reached on the basis of the questionnaire are certainly of importance. As the authors discuss, the use of such printed models greatly facilitates communication, not only between medical practitioners but also with parents, and often with the patients themselves. And, as they also comment, the technique is currently underused in the field of medical education. The authors also comment regarding an alternative approach of producing virtual dissection, which is the one we favor. This is the option to create virtual models from the 3-dimensional datasets and to interrogate them using freely available open-source software, such as Horos, and to view them on a personal computer.2Gupta S.K. Spicer D.E. Anderson R.H. A new low-cost method of virtual cardiac dissection of computed tomographic datasets.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019; 12: 110-116Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Although we are in agreement with Illmann et al.1Illmann C.F. Hosking M. Harris K.C. Utility and access to 3D printing in the context of congenital heart disease: an international physician survey study.Can J Cardiol. 2020; 2: 207-213Google Scholar about the underuse of printed models, we would challenge their suggestion that the use of open-source software does not alleviate one of the most significant limitations, namely, the need for skilled personnel with expertise in “performing segmentation.”1Illmann C.F. Hosking M. Harris K.C. Utility and access to 3D printing in the context of congenital heart disease: an international physician survey study.Can J Cardiol. 2020; 2: 207-213Google Scholar Although this may be true when creating virtual models using segmentation software such as Materialize Mimics, no such “segmentation” is required for virtual dissection.2Gupta S.K. Spicer D.E. Anderson R.H. A new low-cost method of virtual cardiac dissection of computed tomographic datasets.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019; 12: 110-116Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar,3Gupta S.K. Anderson R.H. Virtual dissection: an alternative to surface- rendered virtual three-dimensional cardiac model.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2020; 13: 102-103Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Instead, virtual dissection is no more than a modification of the commonly performed volume-rendering technique. It can be achieved relatively easily by simply altering the opacities of colour maps using the 16-bit Colour Look Up Table editor, which is embedded within the software.2Gupta S.K. Spicer D.E. Anderson R.H. A new low-cost method of virtual cardiac dissection of computed tomographic datasets.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019; 12: 110-116Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Further, the ease of producing reconstructions in clinically relevant views makes virtual dissection an ideal technique to guide planning ahead of surgical or interventional procedures. The images thus produced provide all necessary morphological details. For example, they serve to emphasize the difference between the channel described as the “ventricular septal defect” in the setting of tetralogy of Fallot (Fig. 1) and the channel usually described in this fashion when both arterial trunks arise exclusively from the right ventricle, this being the lesion termed “double outlet right ventricle” (Fig. 2). As the reconstructions show, it would be a disaster if the surgeon closed the so-called ventricular septal defect in the setting of double outlet right ventricle. This is because the channel is, in reality, the outflow tract for the morphologically left ventricle (Fig. 2). It is better described simply as an interventricular communication.4Ebadi A. Spicer D.E. Backer C.L. Fricker F.J. Anderson R.H. Double-outlet right ventricle revisited.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 154: 598-604Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar As shown in Figure 2, such virtual dissection also clearly demonstrates the relationship of the interventricular communication and the proposed site of surgical closure. Our own experience also shows how easy it is, using virtual dissection, to reveal the presence of the pectinate muscles within the morphologically right atrium and to demonstrate the difference in their arrangement in the morphologically left atrium (Fig. 3). As discussed, the problems of making these distinctions in the clinical setting have been held by some pediatric cardiologists to represent a caveat in the determination of atrial arrangement.Figure 2The virtual dissection of a computed tomographic dataset from a 20-month-old girl with double outlet right ventricle shows the morphology of the interventricular communication in anteroposterior (left) and left anterior oblique (right) projections. The defect in the ventricular septum opens to the right ventricle directly beneath the aortic root. The area (green double-headed arrow) around which the surgeon will create a tunnel to reconnect the aortic root with the left ventricle is analogous to the ventricular septal defect in the setting of tetralogy of Fallot (Fig. 1). The area usually currently described as the “ventricular septal defect” is, in reality, the outlet for the morphologically left ventricle (red double-headed arrow). Closure of this area would obviously represent a surgical disaster. It is better described simply as an interventricular communication.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Figure 3Additional virtual dissection of the dataset obtained from the patient shown in Figure 2 shows the extent of pectinate muscles in the morphologically right atrial chamber (left) and the morphologically left atrial chamber (right). The differences in the extent of the pectinate muscles serve to demonstrate the morphology of the chambers. Note that the terminal crest is also well visualised on virtual dissection of the morphologically right atrium.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) The results of the questionnaire, nonetheless, surely indicate that the technique of 3-dimensional printing will become increasingly popular. The costs of the printing itself will presumably diminish with its increasing use. We remain to be convinced, however, that the 3-dimensional printing of the models represents a major advance over the ability to interrogate the virtual datasets on the computer screen, a procedure that incurs no additional cost.3Gupta S.K. Anderson R.H. Virtual dissection: an alternative to surface- rendered virtual three-dimensional cardiac model.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2020; 13: 102-103Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Although printing the model is required in some cases, much can be achieved simply by using the virtual model. We should also take note that the increasingly rapid development of other visualization techniques, such as holography, could well overtake all these currently existing technologies.5Brun H. Bugge R.A.B. Sutherland L.K.R. et al.Mixed reality holograms for heart surgery planning: first user experience in congenital heart disease.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 20: 883-888Crossref PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar No funding was received by the authors in respect to the information contained with the editorial.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,685

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCJC OpenMême sujetAnatomy and Medical TechnologyTravaux en français237 207