MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014614827 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2020.03.011

Printing of Three-Dimensional Heart Models—Is It Worth the Expense?

2020· letter· en· W3014614827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert H. Anderson, Saurabh Kumar Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Relevance (law)MedicineHealth careFamily medicineMedical educationPolitical scienceHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this issue of the Canadian Journal of Cardiology Open, Illmann et al.,1Illmann C.F. Hosking M. Harris K.C. Utility and access to 3D printing in the context of congenital heart disease: an international physician survey study.Can J Cardiol. 2020; 2: 207-213Google Scholar from BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, report their results of a survey carried out with the Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association and the Congenital Cardiac Interventional Study Consortium. As such, it is a relatively small study, but the results probably reflect the current “state of play” with regard to the appreciation of the burgeoning technique. For example, the authors found that those working in centers in the United States were more than 5 times more likely to have access to the necessary technology than those working in Canada. Financial constraints were identified as the barrier to access for half of those responding to the particular question on that topic. These results regarding the financial burden almost certainly represent the situation in other continents, particularly for those still working in the so-called Third World. This is of relevance when the whole world is facing the problem of increasing costs of health care. The conclusions reached on the basis of the questionnaire are certainly of importance. As the authors discuss, the use of such printed models greatly facilitates communication, not only between medical practitioners but also with parents, and often with the patients themselves. And, as they also comment, the technique is currently underused in the field of medical education. The authors also comment regarding an alternative approach of producing virtual dissection, which is the one we favor. This is the option to create virtual models from the 3-dimensional datasets and to interrogate them using freely available open-source software, such as Horos, and to view them on a personal computer.2Gupta S.K. Spicer D.E. Anderson R.H. A new low-cost method of virtual cardiac dissection of computed tomographic datasets.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019; 12: 110-116Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Although we are in agreement with Illmann et al.1Illmann C.F. Hosking M. Harris K.C. Utility and access to 3D printing in the context of congenital heart disease: an international physician survey study.Can J Cardiol. 2020; 2: 207-213Google Scholar about the underuse of printed models, we would challenge their suggestion that the use of open-source software does not alleviate one of the most significant limitations, namely, the need for skilled personnel with expertise in “performing segmentation.”1Illmann C.F. Hosking M. Harris K.C. Utility and access to 3D printing in the context of congenital heart disease: an international physician survey study.Can J Cardiol. 2020; 2: 207-213Google Scholar Although this may be true when creating virtual models using segmentation software such as Materialize Mimics, no such “segmentation” is required for virtual dissection.2Gupta S.K. Spicer D.E. Anderson R.H. A new low-cost method of virtual cardiac dissection of computed tomographic datasets.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019; 12: 110-116Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar,3Gupta S.K. Anderson R.H. Virtual dissection: an alternative to surface- rendered virtual three-dimensional cardiac model.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2020; 13: 102-103Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Instead, virtual dissection is no more than a modification of the commonly performed volume-rendering technique. It can be achieved relatively easily by simply altering the opacities of colour maps using the 16-bit Colour Look Up Table editor, which is embedded within the software.2Gupta S.K. Spicer D.E. Anderson R.H. A new low-cost method of virtual cardiac dissection of computed tomographic datasets.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019; 12: 110-116Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Further, the ease of producing reconstructions in clinically relevant views makes virtual dissection an ideal technique to guide planning ahead of surgical or interventional procedures. The images thus produced provide all necessary morphological details. For example, they serve to emphasize the difference between the channel described as the “ventricular septal defect” in the setting of tetralogy of Fallot (Fig. 1) and the channel usually described in this fashion when both arterial trunks arise exclusively from the right ventricle, this being the lesion termed “double outlet right ventricle” (Fig. 2). As the reconstructions show, it would be a disaster if the surgeon closed the so-called ventricular septal defect in the setting of double outlet right ventricle. This is because the channel is, in reality, the outflow tract for the morphologically left ventricle (Fig. 2). It is better described simply as an interventricular communication.4Ebadi A. Spicer D.E. Backer C.L. Fricker F.J. Anderson R.H. Double-outlet right ventricle revisited.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 154: 598-604Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar As shown in Figure 2, such virtual dissection also clearly demonstrates the relationship of the interventricular communication and the proposed site of surgical closure. Our own experience also shows how easy it is, using virtual dissection, to reveal the presence of the pectinate muscles within the morphologically right atrium and to demonstrate the difference in their arrangement in the morphologically left atrium (Fig. 3). As discussed, the problems of making these distinctions in the clinical setting have been held by some pediatric cardiologists to represent a caveat in the determination of atrial arrangement.Figure 2The virtual dissection of a computed tomographic dataset from a 20-month-old girl with double outlet right ventricle shows the morphology of the interventricular communication in anteroposterior (left) and left anterior oblique (right) projections. The defect in the ventricular septum opens to the right ventricle directly beneath the aortic root. The area (green double-headed arrow) around which the surgeon will create a tunnel to reconnect the aortic root with the left ventricle is analogous to the ventricular septal defect in the setting of tetralogy of Fallot (Fig. 1). The area usually currently described as the “ventricular septal defect” is, in reality, the outlet for the morphologically left ventricle (red double-headed arrow). Closure of this area would obviously represent a surgical disaster. It is better described simply as an interventricular communication.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)Figure 3Additional virtual dissection of the dataset obtained from the patient shown in Figure 2 shows the extent of pectinate muscles in the morphologically right atrial chamber (left) and the morphologically left atrial chamber (right). The differences in the extent of the pectinate muscles serve to demonstrate the morphology of the chambers. Note that the terminal crest is also well visualised on virtual dissection of the morphologically right atrium.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) The results of the questionnaire, nonetheless, surely indicate that the technique of 3-dimensional printing will become increasingly popular. The costs of the printing itself will presumably diminish with its increasing use. We remain to be convinced, however, that the 3-dimensional printing of the models represents a major advance over the ability to interrogate the virtual datasets on the computer screen, a procedure that incurs no additional cost.3Gupta S.K. Anderson R.H. Virtual dissection: an alternative to surface- rendered virtual three-dimensional cardiac model.Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2020; 13: 102-103Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Although printing the model is required in some cases, much can be achieved simply by using the virtual model. We should also take note that the increasingly rapid development of other visualization techniques, such as holography, could well overtake all these currently existing technologies.5Brun H. Bugge R.A.B. Sutherland L.K.R. et al.Mixed reality holograms for heart surgery planning: first user experience in congenital heart disease.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 20: 883-888Crossref PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar No funding was received by the authors in respect to the information contained with the editorial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207