Double Trouble: Challenges of Cancer Care in the Philippines during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic poses many challenges. This article describes these challenges in low and middle income countries such as the Philippines. It is a given fact that delays in the treatment of patients with cancer lead to poorer prognoses.1-2 However since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization last March 11, 2020, various organizations including the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)3 and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO)4 issued resources advising clinicians to postpone routine follow-up visits of patients not on active cancer treatment and advocated telemedicine in place of clinic visits to limit face to face contact and the risk of possible viral transmission. But how about cancer patients with active treatment? How do we prioritize them? A clinical guideline used in Ontario ranks patients who are being treated with aggressive tumors (eg. leukemias, lymphomas, etc), patients with life-threatening situations (eg. leukemic leukostasis or medical emergencies such as febrile neutropenia and hypercalcemia) and patients already receiving treatment as top priority to be seen at the clinic.5 For oncology clinics that continue to operate during this pandemic, the first challenge would be similar to what the other countries all over the world is facing and that is making sure safety precautions are in place to ascertain the safety of both patients and health care providers. These include controlling foot traffic to the treatment facility by limiting one entry / exit point, setting up a triage or screening system to assess all patients before they come in, strictly enforcing social distancing, wearing of the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), proper handwashing, and decongesting clinic schedules as much as possible among others. Another challenge for low-middle countries like the Philippines, where most of the treatment institutions are centered in the urban area of Metro Manila, is the absence of public transportation due to the national government’s declaration of an enhanced community quarantine to control the viral spread.6 Furthermore, majority of the out-patient clinics of the tertiary hospitals that specialize in cancer treatment are also closed since most of the hospital efforts including logistics and manpower are channeled towards the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Emphasis should also be given to the heath care workers who are considered the true irreplaceable assets of this battle against COVID-19. Not only are they working tirelessly in 12 to 36-hour shifts, they likewise are not able go home to their families after work because they have to be quarantined in the hospital or a nearby facility. Unfortunately, reports of healthcare workers being abused and discriminated by the community have been noted because of the stigma and the possibility of being a carrier of the virus.7 Because of this stigma, some patients were reported to have lied about their history of travel and exposure which have caused deaths among doctors.8 The logistical difficulties in ensuring the safety of the patient and the health care workers, transportation problems, and the high workload and social stigma among health care workers are the main challenges of continuing cancer care in the Philippines. The fact that cancer patients needing chemotherapy are currently being displaced from their treatment centers and have nowhere to go as an effect of the national government and the health care system’s efforts to contain and limit the damage of COVID-19 to the population calls for a united stand among oncologists to advocate for the continued treatment of these patients as long as necessary precautions are undertaken to ascertain the safety of both the health care workers and the patients. This might be the biggest battle our health care system has faced in our lifetime. Let us do everything that we can to win, remembering that there are patients who have already been fighting a different battle against cancer even before this pandemic started. Keywords: COVID-19 , cancer care , Challenges
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».