MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015560193 · doi:10.14744/ejmo.2020.46287

Double Trouble: Challenges of Cancer Care in the Philippines during the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020· article· en· W3015560193 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frederic Ivan L. Ting

Bibliographic record

VenueEurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePandemicTriageHealth careGuidelineFamily medicineCancerFebrile neutropeniaNeutropeniaIntensive care medicineMedical emergencyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseaseInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Economic growthChemotherapyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic poses many challenges. This article describes these challenges in low and middle income countries such as the Philippines. It is a given fact that delays in the treatment of patients with cancer lead to poorer prognoses.1-2 However since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization last March 11, 2020, various organizations including the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)3 and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO)4 issued resources advising clinicians to postpone routine follow-up visits of patients not on active cancer treatment and advocated telemedicine in place of clinic visits to limit face to face contact and the risk of possible viral transmission. But how about cancer patients with active treatment? How do we prioritize them? A clinical guideline used in Ontario ranks patients who are being treated with aggressive tumors (eg. leukemias, lymphomas, etc), patients with life-threatening situations (eg. leukemic leukostasis or medical emergencies such as febrile neutropenia and hypercalcemia) and patients already receiving treatment as top priority to be seen at the clinic.5 For oncology clinics that continue to operate during this pandemic, the first challenge would be similar to what the other countries all over the world is facing and that is making sure safety precautions are in place to ascertain the safety of both patients and health care providers. These include controlling foot traffic to the treatment facility by limiting one entry / exit point, setting up a triage or screening system to assess all patients before they come in, strictly enforcing social distancing, wearing of the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), proper handwashing, and decongesting clinic schedules as much as possible among others. Another challenge for low-middle countries like the Philippines, where most of the treatment institutions are centered in the urban area of Metro Manila, is the absence of public transportation due to the national government’s declaration of an enhanced community quarantine to control the viral spread.6 Furthermore, majority of the out-patient clinics of the tertiary hospitals that specialize in cancer treatment are also closed since most of the hospital efforts including logistics and manpower are channeled towards the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Emphasis should also be given to the heath care workers who are considered the true irreplaceable assets of this battle against COVID-19. Not only are they working tirelessly in 12 to 36-hour shifts, they likewise are not able go home to their families after work because they have to be quarantined in the hospital or a nearby facility. Unfortunately, reports of healthcare workers being abused and discriminated by the community have been noted because of the stigma and the possibility of being a carrier of the virus.7 Because of this stigma, some patients were reported to have lied about their history of travel and exposure which have caused deaths among doctors.8 The logistical difficulties in ensuring the safety of the patient and the health care workers, transportation problems, and the high workload and social stigma among health care workers are the main challenges of continuing cancer care in the Philippines. The fact that cancer patients needing chemotherapy are currently being displaced from their treatment centers and have nowhere to go as an effect of the national government and the health care system’s efforts to contain and limit the damage of COVID-19 to the population calls for a united stand among oncologists to advocate for the continued treatment of these patients as long as necessary precautions are undertaken to ascertain the safety of both the health care workers and the patients. This might be the biggest battle our health care system has faced in our lifetime. Let us do everything that we can to win, remembering that there are patients who have already been fighting a different battle against cancer even before this pandemic started. Keywords: COVID-19 , cancer care , Challenges

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurasian Journal of Medicine and OncologySame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207