MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3015764578 · doi:10.1002/ccd.28894

The Evolving Pandemic of <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 and Interventional Cardiology

2020· review· en· W3015764578 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ehtisham Mahmud

Notice bibliographique

RevueCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions · 2020
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicCitationPsychological interventionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Myocardial infarction2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronary angiographyInterventional cardiologyCardiologyInternal medicineLibrary scienceFamily medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The past month has been among the most tumultuous in modern American and world history. The spread of COVID-19 has developed into a worldwide pandemic, and our way of life has been dramatically altered. This national emergency has shuttered schools and restaurants, sports games, and music festivals. Here in California, an eerie quiet has taken over the streets, punctuated only by the rare child riding a bike or a couple walking their dog. I want to express solidarity with our colleagues who are on the front lines, addressing the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Physicians, nurses and allied health care professionals in the emergency departments, intensive care units and inpatient wards are dealing directly with the sickest patients and are, in turn, greatly exposed. We in the interventional and invasive cardiology world are immensely grateful for their efforts and are here to offer support and help. This has been extraordinarily stressful for us as physicians, our families, and for the patients that we have taken an oath to take care of and treat. There are many unknowns, but the universal learning based on the China, Italy, Europe and now California experience is that personal hygiene, social distancing, appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/guidance-risk-assesment-hcp.html), and isolating the highest risk group (age > 65, immunocompromised and/or those with medical comorbidities) have the greatest potential to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 spread and the associated morbidity/mortality. At times like this, we are forced to ask larger questions than those that pertain to just ourselves and determine the best way to move forward. There is a paucity of adequate data to guide our next steps, especially as they relate to the care of cardiovascular patients and those who require management in the catheterization laboratory (Cath Lab). We can leverage the lessons from China and determine how we might want to apply them to our health care systems. As we face the COVID-19 pandemic, The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) is committed to ensuring the health, safety, and well-being of our members, healthcare teams and the patients they treat. SCAI and the American College of Cardiology Interventional Scientific Council have issued a joint statement regarding the management of COVID-19 patients who need Cath Lab services.3 Additionally, SCAI has launched the COVID-19 Resource Center to provide our members updated information for the management of patients with cardiovascular disease during this pandemic. In partnership with the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology (CAIC), we have also launched a series of webinars to educate our membership regarding the relevant issues. Furthermore, SCAI and CAIC have launched the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction (NACMI) registry to investigate outcomes among COVID-19 patients who present with ST elevation. I am providing the above anecdotal example based on the decisions made due to the steadily increasing COVID-19 inpatients being managed at UC San Diego and newly issued state mandates. There are many reasons to reschedule elective procedures in the Cath and EP labs, but the primary driving force is the anticipated surge of patients infected with COVID-19. Each institution and administration will have to determine the best way to approach these decisions in concert with the Centers for Disease Control and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines, and both infectious disease experts and critical care intensivists. This is an unprecedented medical challenge for all of us, and there are many questions for which we do not have immediate answers but have the tools and reach within SCAI to find them. Additionally, we cannot be effective physicians and interventionalists unless we take care of ourselves, our families, children, and senior colleagues. Collectively, we are all facing the anxiety of the unknown and will best be able to address it by remaining calm, organized and systematic in our approaches. We have to work together as an interventional cardiology community by supporting each other, remaining adaptable, and providing the best possible care for our patients.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,983
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,981

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,004
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,143
Tête enseignante GPT0,413
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCatheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsMême sujetCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsTravaux en français237 207