MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015764578 · doi:10.1002/ccd.28894

The Evolving Pandemic of <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 and Interventional Cardiology

2020· review· en· W3015764578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ehtisham Mahmud

Bibliographic record

VenueCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicCitationPsychological interventionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Myocardial infarction2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronary angiographyInterventional cardiologyCardiologyInternal medicineLibrary scienceFamily medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The past month has been among the most tumultuous in modern American and world history. The spread of COVID-19 has developed into a worldwide pandemic, and our way of life has been dramatically altered. This national emergency has shuttered schools and restaurants, sports games, and music festivals. Here in California, an eerie quiet has taken over the streets, punctuated only by the rare child riding a bike or a couple walking their dog. I want to express solidarity with our colleagues who are on the front lines, addressing the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Physicians, nurses and allied health care professionals in the emergency departments, intensive care units and inpatient wards are dealing directly with the sickest patients and are, in turn, greatly exposed. We in the interventional and invasive cardiology world are immensely grateful for their efforts and are here to offer support and help. This has been extraordinarily stressful for us as physicians, our families, and for the patients that we have taken an oath to take care of and treat. There are many unknowns, but the universal learning based on the China, Italy, Europe and now California experience is that personal hygiene, social distancing, appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/guidance-risk-assesment-hcp.html), and isolating the highest risk group (age > 65, immunocompromised and/or those with medical comorbidities) have the greatest potential to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 spread and the associated morbidity/mortality. At times like this, we are forced to ask larger questions than those that pertain to just ourselves and determine the best way to move forward. There is a paucity of adequate data to guide our next steps, especially as they relate to the care of cardiovascular patients and those who require management in the catheterization laboratory (Cath Lab). We can leverage the lessons from China and determine how we might want to apply them to our health care systems. As we face the COVID-19 pandemic, The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) is committed to ensuring the health, safety, and well-being of our members, healthcare teams and the patients they treat. SCAI and the American College of Cardiology Interventional Scientific Council have issued a joint statement regarding the management of COVID-19 patients who need Cath Lab services.3 Additionally, SCAI has launched the COVID-19 Resource Center to provide our members updated information for the management of patients with cardiovascular disease during this pandemic. In partnership with the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology (CAIC), we have also launched a series of webinars to educate our membership regarding the relevant issues. Furthermore, SCAI and CAIC have launched the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction (NACMI) registry to investigate outcomes among COVID-19 patients who present with ST elevation. I am providing the above anecdotal example based on the decisions made due to the steadily increasing COVID-19 inpatients being managed at UC San Diego and newly issued state mandates. There are many reasons to reschedule elective procedures in the Cath and EP labs, but the primary driving force is the anticipated surge of patients infected with COVID-19. Each institution and administration will have to determine the best way to approach these decisions in concert with the Centers for Disease Control and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines, and both infectious disease experts and critical care intensivists. This is an unprecedented medical challenge for all of us, and there are many questions for which we do not have immediate answers but have the tools and reach within SCAI to find them. Additionally, we cannot be effective physicians and interventionalists unless we take care of ourselves, our families, children, and senior colleagues. Collectively, we are all facing the anxiety of the unknown and will best be able to address it by remaining calm, organized and systematic in our approaches. We have to work together as an interventional cardiology community by supporting each other, remaining adaptable, and providing the best possible care for our patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCatheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsSame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207