Public Health Managers' Perspectives on the Use of Social Marketing Among Public Health Nurses in Saskatchewan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Social marketing is a branch of health communication that has, over the last thirty years, become widely accepted in public health practice.By definition, "social marketing is the use of marketing principles and techniques to influence a target audience to voluntarily accept, reject, modify, or abandon behavior for the benefit of individuals, groups, or society as a whole" (Kotler, Roberto, & Lee, 2002, p. 5).Because social marketing is consumer focused and client centered, it is consistent with the accepted paradigm of health promotion in public health nursing.In Canada, population focused health promotion strategies, such as social marketing, are an integral part of the mandate of public health nurses (PHNs) (Community Health Nurses Association of Canada, 2003).Despite this mandate, a review of recent literature points to a misunderstanding and under-use of the strategy (McDermott, 2000; Quinn, Albrecht, Marshall, & Akintobi, 2005; Schoenfeld & MacDonald, 2002).Using a qualitative approach, the author of this study examined the use of social marketing among public health nurses from the perspective of public health managers in the province of Saskatchewan.Community based action research approach was used to identify enablers, barriers and strategies associated with social marketing use.In addition, a quantitative participant demographics questionnaire was employed to aid in the analysis of qualitative data.Two health regions were chosen for data collection sites as convenience samples in this study.Within these health regions, complete population sampling was employed.The total population group comprised of 19 public health managers.Of these, 12 directly managed, and 7 indirectly managed public health nurses.The total number of study participants was 11 of 12 direct managers, representing 92% of that population.Within focus group sessions, enablers and barriers to the use of social marketing were identified using nominal group process.Enablers included: BSN preparation, client centered and evidence-based practice, established community relationships, nature of health challenges, and support of nursing organizations.Barriers included: human resources, financial resources, familiarity with the strategy, and formal process to maintain momentum.Strategies for reinforcing enablers and overcoming barriers were also identified in group discussion.These included: a social marketing elective in health science, an increase in the number of PHNs and support staff, core funding for social marketing, in-service training, and a social marketing consultant.Ultimately, an increase in the awareness of social marketing among upper-level health management was identified as a necessary precursor to the successful implementation of all the identified strategies.Finally, the potential applicability of two theoretical models in explaining and/or predicting the influence of factors on public health nurses' use of social marketing in Saskatchewan was explored.The Diffusion of Innovation Model was proposed as a framework through which to examine the factors associated with social marketing use because of its inclusion of both individual and system level influences.It was determined that the Health Promotion Model was not the most appropriate model for this purpose, as it primarily focused on individual influences on behavior.This focus was inconsistent with the system level nature of factors identified by participants.It is the hope of the researcher that an understanding of the factors associated with social marketing use and Dr. Rein Lepnurm.Your hard work and mentorship throughout this process, was invaluable.Thank you.Appreciation is also extended to the health regions within which this study took place, and the public health managers who graciously agreed to participate.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».