MON-502 Clinical-Pathological and Molecular Prognostic Markers in Aggressive and Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Cancers; A Tertiary-Center Experience
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer (AV-PTC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancers (PDTC) are 2 malignancies that lie in between the well-differentiated and the undifferentiated anaplastic cancers. While management of those well-differentiated cancers is established in the literature, that of AV-PTC and PDTC is less clear as they behave different to their more benign counterparts. The aim of this study is to describe the clinico-pathologic characteristics and genotypic background of AV-PTC and PDTC and to assess their prognostic value. Methods: The charts of all patients with thyroid cancer in our center for the last 10 years were retrospectively reviewed. Those with AV-PTC and PDTC were selected and included in the analysis. Clinical presentation, pathologic characteristics, molecular markers, specific treatments and clinical outcomes were compared among groups. Results: Out of 3244 thyroid cancer charts reviewed, 87 patients met the criteria for AV-PTC (n=45) and PDTC (n=42). Mean age at diagnosis was 48.1 years (SD 17.8), with female predominance (64.4% vs 35.6%). Median duration of follow up was 3 years (0.1-30). Out of the 75 patients with follow up for more than a year, 42.7% had either persistent disease or recurrence (52.6% in AV-PTC and 32.4% in PDTC) and 4.1% died. Presence of vascular invasion was associated with higher rates of persistent or recurrent disease (74.1% in positive vascular invasion vs 20.5% in negative vascular invasion, p < 0.001). Recurrence rate was 0% in patients with Ki67 < 10% and 40% in those >= 10%. There was no difference in terms of recurrence based on presence of BRAF mutation (33% in BRAF+ & 29% in BRAF-, p=1), or percentage of aggressive/poorly differentiated tumor involvement (48% in > 30% involvement vs 28% in < 30%, p = 0.132). Discussion and conclusion: The prevalence of AV-PTC and PDTC in this cohort was low at 1.3% each, and the rate of patients with persistent or recurrent disease at 1 year after primary therapy was also similar to that reported (42.7%). The mortality rates, however, in our study is surprisingly lower than that expected elsewhere (4.1%), most likely attributed to a shorter follow up period. Patients with absent vascular invasion were less likely to have persistent or recurrent disease. Those with lower Ki67 (<10%) also had lower relapse rate, although, the p value was > 0.05. It is worth mentioning that even though there were higher rates of recurrence among those with > 30% tumor involvement, it did not reach statistical significance, supporting recent studies stating that even tumor involvement of > 10% can have adverse outcomes. In conclusion, AV-PTC and PDTC are relatively rare but aggressive tumors. Possible prognostic markers that can be used to guide therapy and monitoring include: vascular invasion, extra-thyroidal extension, response to primary therapy and the proliferative index Ki67.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».