MON-502 Clinical-Pathological and Molecular Prognostic Markers in Aggressive and Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Cancers; A Tertiary-Center Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer (AV-PTC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancers (PDTC) are 2 malignancies that lie in between the well-differentiated and the undifferentiated anaplastic cancers. While management of those well-differentiated cancers is established in the literature, that of AV-PTC and PDTC is less clear as they behave different to their more benign counterparts. The aim of this study is to describe the clinico-pathologic characteristics and genotypic background of AV-PTC and PDTC and to assess their prognostic value. Methods: The charts of all patients with thyroid cancer in our center for the last 10 years were retrospectively reviewed. Those with AV-PTC and PDTC were selected and included in the analysis. Clinical presentation, pathologic characteristics, molecular markers, specific treatments and clinical outcomes were compared among groups. Results: Out of 3244 thyroid cancer charts reviewed, 87 patients met the criteria for AV-PTC (n=45) and PDTC (n=42). Mean age at diagnosis was 48.1 years (SD 17.8), with female predominance (64.4% vs 35.6%). Median duration of follow up was 3 years (0.1-30). Out of the 75 patients with follow up for more than a year, 42.7% had either persistent disease or recurrence (52.6% in AV-PTC and 32.4% in PDTC) and 4.1% died. Presence of vascular invasion was associated with higher rates of persistent or recurrent disease (74.1% in positive vascular invasion vs 20.5% in negative vascular invasion, p < 0.001). Recurrence rate was 0% in patients with Ki67 < 10% and 40% in those >= 10%. There was no difference in terms of recurrence based on presence of BRAF mutation (33% in BRAF+ & 29% in BRAF-, p=1), or percentage of aggressive/poorly differentiated tumor involvement (48% in > 30% involvement vs 28% in < 30%, p = 0.132). Discussion and conclusion: The prevalence of AV-PTC and PDTC in this cohort was low at 1.3% each, and the rate of patients with persistent or recurrent disease at 1 year after primary therapy was also similar to that reported (42.7%). The mortality rates, however, in our study is surprisingly lower than that expected elsewhere (4.1%), most likely attributed to a shorter follow up period. Patients with absent vascular invasion were less likely to have persistent or recurrent disease. Those with lower Ki67 (<10%) also had lower relapse rate, although, the p value was > 0.05. It is worth mentioning that even though there were higher rates of recurrence among those with > 30% tumor involvement, it did not reach statistical significance, supporting recent studies stating that even tumor involvement of > 10% can have adverse outcomes. In conclusion, AV-PTC and PDTC are relatively rare but aggressive tumors. Possible prognostic markers that can be used to guide therapy and monitoring include: vascular invasion, extra-thyroidal extension, response to primary therapy and the proliferative index Ki67.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".