1176 Survey Of Knowledge Of Pediatric Trainees Regarding Obstructive Sleep Apnea In Children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) causes significant morbidity in children. Very few studies were conducted among pediatricians regarding sleep and sleep disorders in children and adolescents. They demonstrated significant gaps in knowledge in the recognition and management of OSA. Methods We conducted a survey among the pediatric residents in the screening and diagnosis of OSA. The survey consist of 15 questions related to OSA in children. It aimed at identifying gaps in their knowledge and educating them accordingly. Following the survey, core lectures were included in the pediatric curriculum which aimed at educating them with the causes, diagnosis, management and sequelae of untreated OSA. Results 37 pediatric residents took part in the survey. They were from first, second and third year of the pediatric residency training program respectively in an university hospital. 45% of them belong to the first year, 29% of them belong to the second year and 24% of them belong to the third year of training.Only a quarter of them had completed rotations in Pediatric Pulmonology for at least two weeks at the time of the survey. Three questions related to identifying at risk groups, four questions related to identification of the signs and symptoms, and three questions related to the diagnostic criteria and five questions related to the treatment and follow up of OSA. 46% of the residents accurately answered the questions related to screening and identifying children at risk of OSA. 57% of them identified the signs and symptoms of OSA in children.41% of them answered the questions related to diagnosis appropriately and 49% had correct responses for the questions related to treatment of OSA and follow up. Conclusion Less than 50% of the pediatric trainees could accurately identify the at risk groups and symptoms of OSA. These pediatric trainees who are future pediatricians form the referral source for children with OSA and educating them is vital.This reemphasizes the need for the pediatric training programmes to include mandatory training modules related to Pediatric sleep disorders, OSA in particular in the pediatric core curriculum. Support None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».