MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029577158 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.1170

1176 Survey Of Knowledge Of Pediatric Trainees Regarding Obstructive Sleep Apnea In Children

2020· article· en· W3029577158 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Prabhavathi Gummalla, S Lee, Salvador Soriano, Emily Concepcion

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObstructive sleep apneaPediatricsFamily medicineQuarter (Canadian coin)Sleep medicinePsychiatrySleep disorderInternal medicineInsomnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) causes significant morbidity in children. Very few studies were conducted among pediatricians regarding sleep and sleep disorders in children and adolescents. They demonstrated significant gaps in knowledge in the recognition and management of OSA. Methods We conducted a survey among the pediatric residents in the screening and diagnosis of OSA. The survey consist of 15 questions related to OSA in children. It aimed at identifying gaps in their knowledge and educating them accordingly. Following the survey, core lectures were included in the pediatric curriculum which aimed at educating them with the causes, diagnosis, management and sequelae of untreated OSA. Results 37 pediatric residents took part in the survey. They were from first, second and third year of the pediatric residency training program respectively in an university hospital. 45% of them belong to the first year, 29% of them belong to the second year and 24% of them belong to the third year of training.Only a quarter of them had completed rotations in Pediatric Pulmonology for at least two weeks at the time of the survey. Three questions related to identifying at risk groups, four questions related to identification of the signs and symptoms, and three questions related to the diagnostic criteria and five questions related to the treatment and follow up of OSA. 46% of the residents accurately answered the questions related to screening and identifying children at risk of OSA. 57% of them identified the signs and symptoms of OSA in children.41% of them answered the questions related to diagnosis appropriately and 49% had correct responses for the questions related to treatment of OSA and follow up. Conclusion Less than 50% of the pediatric trainees could accurately identify the at risk groups and symptoms of OSA. These pediatric trainees who are future pediatricians form the referral source for children with OSA and educating them is vital.This reemphasizes the need for the pediatric training programmes to include mandatory training modules related to Pediatric sleep disorders, OSA in particular in the pediatric core curriculum. Support None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207