Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To Maria Mies, who in Narsapur discovered how the whole world works.One must continue talking about labour in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic, because the labouring poor have always been particularly exposed to health-related risks.This is because the labouring poor perform key reproductive roles in capitalism; indeed, across the world, low-paid informal labourers and care workers are those who, at present, seem unable to withdraw their labour to shield themselves and their families from the potential deadly consequences of the coronavirus.Together with health workers, they are literally sustaining our lives during the pandemic.The health-depleting effects of working poverty have always been obvious in the Global South.Now, they are also increasingly obvious in the Global North.Here, I celebrate the Global Labour Journal's tenth anniversary by discussing how the study of labour dynamics of the Global South can significantly contribute to our broader understanding of global capitalism across the world.After all, as underlined by Jan Breman and Marcel van der Linden (2014), it is clear by now that the "West" is following the "Rest" when it comes to rising rates of labour informalisation, which has become the "mode of employment" at a global level.In fact, the very representation of the so-called Western labour trajectory has always been somewhat biasedover-representing the experience of a handful of core countries within the Western bloc and a (male) labour aristocracy within highly differentiated working classes.Ultimately, capitalism has only ever been "Golden" for a very few, in a very few places, and during a very few years.The progressive pace of labour informalisation is remarkable, and suggests that this is how work manifests itself in the twenty-first century.According to the International Labour Organization (ILO, 2018), 85.8 per cent of total employment in Africa, 71.4 per cent in Asia and the Pacific, 68.6 per cent in the Arab States and 53.8 per cent in the Americas is either informal (based in the informal economy) or informalised (situated within formal production but based on informal relations).Total informal employment for the whole emerging and developing economies bloc is set at 69.6 per cent and, given the weight of this bloc and the extension of processes of precarisation across the whole Global North, it is 61.2 per cent at world level.In short, our entire planet primarily labours informally. 1 If by refocusing our attention on the Global South much can be learned about how the world labours, a good deal can also be understood with regard to the mechanisms of exploitation and labour surplus extraction.In particular, the study of the informal and informalised labour relations across the Global South reveals that exploitation can indeed take many distinct "forms" (Banaji, 2010) where, for instance, the wage relation may be direct or "disguised" -like in the 1 Informalisation in former Soviet bloc countries is documented by Jeremy Morris and Abel Polese (2015).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,022 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».