MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3034639791 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.15.151076

Segmentation-less, automated vascular vectorization robustly extracts neurovascular network statistics from in vivo two-photon images

2020· preprint· en· W3034639791 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel A. Mihelic, William A. Sikora, Ahmed M. Hassan, Michael R. Williamson, Theresa A. Jones, Andrew K. Dunn

Notice bibliographique

RevuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institutes of Health
Mots-clésComputer scienceVectorization (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceSegmentationComputer visionVoxelImage segmentationPattern recognition (psychology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Recent advances in two-photon microscopy (2PM) have allowed large scale imaging and analysis of blood vessel networks in living mice. However, extracting a network graph and vector representations for vessels remain bottlenecks in many applications. Vascular vectorization is algorithmically difficult because blood vessels have many shapes and sizes, the samples are often unevenly illuminated, and large image volumes are required to achieve good statistical power. State-of-the-art, three-dimensional, vascular vectorization approaches often require a segmented (binary) image, relying on manual or supervised-machine annotation. Therefore, voxel-by-voxel image segmentation is biased by the human annotator or trainer. Furthermore, segmented images oftentimes require remedial morphological filtering before skeletonization or vectorization. To address these limitations, we present a vectorization method to extract vascular objects directly from unsegmented images without the need for machine learning or training. The Segmentation-Less, Automated, Vascular Vectorization (SLAVV) source code in MATLAB is openly available on GitHub. This novel method uses simple models of vascular anatomy, efficient linear filtering, and low-complexity vector extraction algorithms to remove the image segmentation requirement, replacing it with manual or automated vector classification. SLAVV is demonstrated on three in vivo 2PM image volumes of microvascular networks (capillaries, arterioles and venules) in the mouse cortex. Vectorization performance is proven robust to the choice of plasma- or endothelial-labeled contrast, and processing costs are shown to scale with input image volume. Fully-automated SLAVV performance is evaluated on simulated 2PM images of varying quality all based on the large (1.4×0.9×0.6 mm 3 and 1.6×10 8 voxel) input image. Vascular statistics of interest (e.g. volume fraction, surface area density) calculated from automatically vectorized images show greater robustness to image quality than those calculated from intensity-thresholded images. Author summary Samuel Mihelic is a PhD candidate in the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin. He graduated from Oregon State University (Chemical Engineering BS, Mathematics BS). He hosts the GitHub repository for the code used in this article: https://github.com/UTFOIL/Vectorization-Public . His research interests are in-vivo neural microvascular image analysis, anatomy, and plasticity. William Sikora graduated with a BS in Computational Biomedical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in May 2020. He is working with Dr. Yuan Yang and the Laureate Institute for Brain Research as a PhD student of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Tulsa, researching the highly non-linear world of neural coupling and its link to common neurological pathologies such as stroke. Ahmed Hassan is a graduate of the University of California, Los Angeles and the University of Texas at Austin with a Bachelor's degree in Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics and an MSE/PhD in Biomedical Engineering. His graduate research was concentrated in imaging and instrumentation, and his interests include developing optical and laser systems for neuroimaging, image processing and reconstruction, and advanced image analysis. Michael Williamson earned a BSc (Honours) in Neuroscience in 2016 from the University of Alberta, where he trained with Dr. Fred Colbourne. He is currently a doctoral student at the University of Texas at Austin working in the labs of Drs. Theresa Jones and Michael Drew. Theresa Jones is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience at The University of Texas at Austin. Her laboratory studies plasticity of neural structure and synaptic connectivity following brain damage and injury. Andrew K. Dunn is the Donald J. Douglass Centennial Professor of Engineering in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and the Director of the Center for Emerging Imaging Technologies. His research focuses on the development of innovative optical imaging techniques for studying the brain.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,145
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,246
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Même sujetAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesTravaux en français237 207