MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034639791 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.15.151076

Segmentation-less, automated vascular vectorization robustly extracts neurovascular network statistics from in vivo two-photon images

2020· preprint· en· W3034639791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel A. Mihelic, William A. Sikora, Ahmed M. Hassan, Michael R. Williamson, Theresa A. Jones, Andrew K. Dunn

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsComputer scienceVectorization (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceSegmentationComputer visionVoxelImage segmentationPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent advances in two-photon microscopy (2PM) have allowed large scale imaging and analysis of blood vessel networks in living mice. However, extracting a network graph and vector representations for vessels remain bottlenecks in many applications. Vascular vectorization is algorithmically difficult because blood vessels have many shapes and sizes, the samples are often unevenly illuminated, and large image volumes are required to achieve good statistical power. State-of-the-art, three-dimensional, vascular vectorization approaches often require a segmented (binary) image, relying on manual or supervised-machine annotation. Therefore, voxel-by-voxel image segmentation is biased by the human annotator or trainer. Furthermore, segmented images oftentimes require remedial morphological filtering before skeletonization or vectorization. To address these limitations, we present a vectorization method to extract vascular objects directly from unsegmented images without the need for machine learning or training. The Segmentation-Less, Automated, Vascular Vectorization (SLAVV) source code in MATLAB is openly available on GitHub. This novel method uses simple models of vascular anatomy, efficient linear filtering, and low-complexity vector extraction algorithms to remove the image segmentation requirement, replacing it with manual or automated vector classification. SLAVV is demonstrated on three in vivo 2PM image volumes of microvascular networks (capillaries, arterioles and venules) in the mouse cortex. Vectorization performance is proven robust to the choice of plasma- or endothelial-labeled contrast, and processing costs are shown to scale with input image volume. Fully-automated SLAVV performance is evaluated on simulated 2PM images of varying quality all based on the large (1.4×0.9×0.6 mm 3 and 1.6×10 8 voxel) input image. Vascular statistics of interest (e.g. volume fraction, surface area density) calculated from automatically vectorized images show greater robustness to image quality than those calculated from intensity-thresholded images. Author summary Samuel Mihelic is a PhD candidate in the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin. He graduated from Oregon State University (Chemical Engineering BS, Mathematics BS). He hosts the GitHub repository for the code used in this article: https://github.com/UTFOIL/Vectorization-Public . His research interests are in-vivo neural microvascular image analysis, anatomy, and plasticity. William Sikora graduated with a BS in Computational Biomedical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in May 2020. He is working with Dr. Yuan Yang and the Laureate Institute for Brain Research as a PhD student of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Tulsa, researching the highly non-linear world of neural coupling and its link to common neurological pathologies such as stroke. Ahmed Hassan is a graduate of the University of California, Los Angeles and the University of Texas at Austin with a Bachelor's degree in Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics and an MSE/PhD in Biomedical Engineering. His graduate research was concentrated in imaging and instrumentation, and his interests include developing optical and laser systems for neuroimaging, image processing and reconstruction, and advanced image analysis. Michael Williamson earned a BSc (Honours) in Neuroscience in 2016 from the University of Alberta, where he trained with Dr. Fred Colbourne. He is currently a doctoral student at the University of Texas at Austin working in the labs of Drs. Theresa Jones and Michael Drew. Theresa Jones is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience at The University of Texas at Austin. Her laboratory studies plasticity of neural structure and synaptic connectivity following brain damage and injury. Andrew K. Dunn is the Donald J. Douglass Centennial Professor of Engineering in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and the Director of the Center for Emerging Imaging Technologies. His research focuses on the development of innovative optical imaging techniques for studying the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207