MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3036772552 · doi:10.1016/j.xjon.2020.06.003

Commentary: Changing the equation by boosting the numerator

2020· editorial· en· W3036772552 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Najmeh, Matthew G. Hartwig

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Open · 2020
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBoosting (machine learning)MathematicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageOur current methods of organ assessment and procurement harken from over half a century ago. Dr Keshavjee provides us here with a thoughtfully articulated version of the not-so-distant future.See Article page 164. Our current methods of organ assessment and procurement harken from over half a century ago. Dr Keshavjee provides us here with a thoughtfully articulated version of the not-so-distant future. See Article page 164. Despite all the recent advances in organ-procurement organizations, allocation system, increased use of extended-criteria donors, use of lungs from donation after cardiac death donors, and increase in number of centers performing lung transplants globally, the number of patients requiring lung transplant each year continues to grow. Even though the number of donors continues to steadily increase, in the United States fewer than 1 in 4 pairs of lungs offered for donation will be eventually used for transplant, and hundreds of thousands of people around the world continue to die each year from end-stage lung disease.1Valapour M. Lehr C.J. Skeans M.A. Smith J.M. Uccellini K. Goff R. et al.OPTN/SRTR 2018 annual data report: lung.Am J Transplant. 2020; 20: 427-508Crossref PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar Instead of focusing on increasing the denominator, or the number of available donors, the Toronto group began focusing a number of years ago on the numerator, or number of donor organs deemed suitable for transplantation. Stopping to reflect upon it, the current way of assessing a donor's lungs is remarkably inefficient. Today, transplant professionals review the donor's history, thoracic imaging, bronchoscopy findings, and function. The critical and expensive next step consists of traveling to the donor hospital for a more direct and final assessment of the organ. In vivo examination of the lungs allows the surgeon to evaluate the lung compliance and inspect any abnormal areas identified on previous imaging. If the organ is deemed “inadequate” by the procuring surgeon at that time, the process usually terminates and the organ is discarded with very minimal chance of reallocation due to time constraints. This process of donor lung assessment undoubtedly leads to loss of potentially good allografts. Dr Keshavjee's re-imagination of the organ-management ecosystem has never been more relevant. In his model, organs from the same donor are transported to a central organ repair and optimization center, where experts can further evaluate, treat, and potentially improve the organs from the state in which they were retrieved before sending them out to the implanting centers. This process not only expands the number of organs that will be deemed fit for transplant as demonstrated by the Toronto group experience2Chang S.H. Kreisel D. Marklin G.F. Cook L. Hachem R. Kozower B.D. et al.Lung focused resuscitation at a specialized donor care facility improves lung procurement rates.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105: 1531-1536Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar but may also drastically change the whole dynamic of the transplant experience by allowing organ enhancements to occur and making transplant surgery a more scheduled practice.3Cypel M. Yeung J.C. Keshavjee S. Introducing the concept of semielective lung transplantation through the use of ex vivo lung perfusion.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156: 2350-2352Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar The gap between the current state of lung assessment and selection and the data presented in this work is a sizeable one, and many more mundane but important biological, economical, and logistical details require resolution. Although the financial impact remains unclear when considering the multiple layers of the procurement process undergoing change, many experts voice concerns about the overall economic implications on the health care system. Others have raised biological concerns, such as the possible adverse impact of 2 disparate cold ischemic periods on the organs.4Leiva-Juárez M.M. Urso A. Arango Tomás E. Lederer D.J. Sanchez P. Griffith B. et al.Extended post-ex vivo lung perfusion cold preservation predicts primary graft dysfunction and mortality: results from a multicentric study.J Heart Lung Transplant. May 16, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (17) Google Scholar More importantly, the willingness of surgeons to change their existing practice and adopt this new approach might be toughest mountain to climb. Interestingly, the ongoing coronavirus 2019 pandemic has made us question the process of having multiple procuring teams from different centers travel to the donor hospital and has forcibly altered surgeons' acceptance of other personnel procuring their recipient's organs. Alternative, but analogous, systems can also be envisioned. As technology improves, we imagine easily portable, reliable, and cost-effective organ-preservation devices that allow for normothermic evaluation and rehabilitation during travel. Facing a need for broader geographic sharing in the United States, newly imposed travel restrictions, and a desire to minimize the cost and risk to procurement teams, trained specialists at regional procurement centers could routinely obtain donated organs, place them on perfusion devices, and transport the organs to the most appropriate recipient wherever they may be geographically located. A lung in Hawaii could be procured one day, transported to the East Coast of the United States 4500 miles away, and safely be transplanted 24 hours later. Although the details remain to be determined, it is clear that our “modern” methods of organ assessment and procurement harken from over half a century ago. Dr Keshavjee provides us with a thoughtfully articulated version of the not-so-distant future.5Keshavjee S. Human organ repair centers: fact or fiction?.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2020; 3: 164-168Scopus (9) Google Scholar The time is now for the transplant community to move this important agenda forward for the benefit of all patients who suffer from end-stage organ disease. Human organ repair centers: Fact or fiction?JTCVS OpenVol. 3PreviewFeature Editor Note—Although lung transplantation continues to evolve with the refinement of surgical techniques and improvements in organ preservation, there continues to be a critical shortage of donor lungs available, and a substantial number of donor lungs are discarded due to questionable quality. The University of Toronto group has published extensively on the use of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to evaluate marginal donor lungs, demonstrating that many of these lungs can be successfully transplanted. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,866

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJTCVS OpenMême sujetMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesTravaux en français237 207