MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036772552 · doi:10.1016/j.xjon.2020.06.003

Commentary: Changing the equation by boosting the numerator

2020· editorial· en· W3036772552 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Najmeh, Matthew G. Hartwig

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Open · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoosting (machine learning)MathematicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central MessageOur current methods of organ assessment and procurement harken from over half a century ago. Dr Keshavjee provides us here with a thoughtfully articulated version of the not-so-distant future.See Article page 164. Our current methods of organ assessment and procurement harken from over half a century ago. Dr Keshavjee provides us here with a thoughtfully articulated version of the not-so-distant future. See Article page 164. Despite all the recent advances in organ-procurement organizations, allocation system, increased use of extended-criteria donors, use of lungs from donation after cardiac death donors, and increase in number of centers performing lung transplants globally, the number of patients requiring lung transplant each year continues to grow. Even though the number of donors continues to steadily increase, in the United States fewer than 1 in 4 pairs of lungs offered for donation will be eventually used for transplant, and hundreds of thousands of people around the world continue to die each year from end-stage lung disease.1Valapour M. Lehr C.J. Skeans M.A. Smith J.M. Uccellini K. Goff R. et al.OPTN/SRTR 2018 annual data report: lung.Am J Transplant. 2020; 20: 427-508Crossref PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar Instead of focusing on increasing the denominator, or the number of available donors, the Toronto group began focusing a number of years ago on the numerator, or number of donor organs deemed suitable for transplantation. Stopping to reflect upon it, the current way of assessing a donor's lungs is remarkably inefficient. Today, transplant professionals review the donor's history, thoracic imaging, bronchoscopy findings, and function. The critical and expensive next step consists of traveling to the donor hospital for a more direct and final assessment of the organ. In vivo examination of the lungs allows the surgeon to evaluate the lung compliance and inspect any abnormal areas identified on previous imaging. If the organ is deemed “inadequate” by the procuring surgeon at that time, the process usually terminates and the organ is discarded with very minimal chance of reallocation due to time constraints. This process of donor lung assessment undoubtedly leads to loss of potentially good allografts. Dr Keshavjee's re-imagination of the organ-management ecosystem has never been more relevant. In his model, organs from the same donor are transported to a central organ repair and optimization center, where experts can further evaluate, treat, and potentially improve the organs from the state in which they were retrieved before sending them out to the implanting centers. This process not only expands the number of organs that will be deemed fit for transplant as demonstrated by the Toronto group experience2Chang S.H. Kreisel D. Marklin G.F. Cook L. Hachem R. Kozower B.D. et al.Lung focused resuscitation at a specialized donor care facility improves lung procurement rates.Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105: 1531-1536Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar but may also drastically change the whole dynamic of the transplant experience by allowing organ enhancements to occur and making transplant surgery a more scheduled practice.3Cypel M. Yeung J.C. Keshavjee S. Introducing the concept of semielective lung transplantation through the use of ex vivo lung perfusion.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156: 2350-2352Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar The gap between the current state of lung assessment and selection and the data presented in this work is a sizeable one, and many more mundane but important biological, economical, and logistical details require resolution. Although the financial impact remains unclear when considering the multiple layers of the procurement process undergoing change, many experts voice concerns about the overall economic implications on the health care system. Others have raised biological concerns, such as the possible adverse impact of 2 disparate cold ischemic periods on the organs.4Leiva-Juárez M.M. Urso A. Arango Tomás E. Lederer D.J. Sanchez P. Griffith B. et al.Extended post-ex vivo lung perfusion cold preservation predicts primary graft dysfunction and mortality: results from a multicentric study.J Heart Lung Transplant. May 16, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (17) Google Scholar More importantly, the willingness of surgeons to change their existing practice and adopt this new approach might be toughest mountain to climb. Interestingly, the ongoing coronavirus 2019 pandemic has made us question the process of having multiple procuring teams from different centers travel to the donor hospital and has forcibly altered surgeons' acceptance of other personnel procuring their recipient's organs. Alternative, but analogous, systems can also be envisioned. As technology improves, we imagine easily portable, reliable, and cost-effective organ-preservation devices that allow for normothermic evaluation and rehabilitation during travel. Facing a need for broader geographic sharing in the United States, newly imposed travel restrictions, and a desire to minimize the cost and risk to procurement teams, trained specialists at regional procurement centers could routinely obtain donated organs, place them on perfusion devices, and transport the organs to the most appropriate recipient wherever they may be geographically located. A lung in Hawaii could be procured one day, transported to the East Coast of the United States 4500 miles away, and safely be transplanted 24 hours later. Although the details remain to be determined, it is clear that our “modern” methods of organ assessment and procurement harken from over half a century ago. Dr Keshavjee provides us with a thoughtfully articulated version of the not-so-distant future.5Keshavjee S. Human organ repair centers: fact or fiction?.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2020; 3: 164-168Scopus (9) Google Scholar The time is now for the transplant community to move this important agenda forward for the benefit of all patients who suffer from end-stage organ disease. Human organ repair centers: Fact or fiction?JTCVS OpenVol. 3PreviewFeature Editor Note—Although lung transplantation continues to evolve with the refinement of surgical techniques and improvements in organ preservation, there continues to be a critical shortage of donor lungs available, and a substantial number of donor lungs are discarded due to questionable quality. The University of Toronto group has published extensively on the use of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to evaluate marginal donor lungs, demonstrating that many of these lungs can be successfully transplanted. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS OpenSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207