MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3037716190 · doi:10.1353/nin.2017.0016

The First Japanese Professionals: Guy Green's 1906 Japanese Base Ball Team

2017· article· en· W3037716190 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert K. Fitts

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNewspaperManagementMedia studiesArt historyHistorySociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The First Japanese ProfessionalsGuy Green's 1906 Japanese Base Ball Team Robert K. Fitts (bio) Baseball historians have a fetish for documenting first occurrences. The first game, the first curveball, the first no-hitter, the first player of each ethnicity. As Japan's professional game began in the 1920s with independent teams and solidified with the creation of Nippon Professional Baseball in 1936, the first Japanese professional played in the United States not Japan. For decades, historians have identified this player as Goro Mikami, a graduate of Waseda University who played for the independent barnstorming All Nations team in 1914 and 1915. But with the proliferation of searchable digital newspaper archives, we now know that before Mikami, an independent team called Guy Green's Japanese Base Ball Team barnstormed across the Midwest in 1906, becoming the first professional Japanese players on either side of the Pacific. ________ Guy Green grew up in Stromsburg, Nebraska, studied at Doane College from 1887 to 1891, the University of Iowa in 1893, and graduated from the University of Nebraska College of Law in 1897. He had captained Doane's baseball team but was not destined for a career in pro ball. "I was death to flies," Green wrote in 1900, "but I had to carry the ball in as I couldn't throw it over fifty feet. I retired in disgust and at the earnest request of the captain after playing a few games … During my stay in Stromsburg I managed and captained the local nine and played first base. My arm was as bad as ever and the only way I ever got the ball from one corner of the diamond to the other was by running half way across and pushing the sphere the rest of the way. I ceased playing base ball altogether in 1897, but have never lost my love for the sport. I consider it the king of athletic amusements."1 Instead of playing, Green turned his considerable creative and entrepreneurial talents toward owning and running his own team. [End Page 9] The early twentieth century was the heyday of barnstorming baseball. Independent teams crisscrossed the country playing in one-horse towns and large cities. Often organizers created teams around a theme to attract customers. There were all female teams, squads of only fat men, clubs of men sporting beards, and teams consisting of "exotic" ethnicities. African American clubs, excluded from Organized Baseball leagues, commonly supplemented their incomes by barnstorming against town teams. Some of these clubs provided other forms of entertainment; bringing along musicians, jugglers, acrobats and even high-wire walkers. These independent squads were often called "semi-professional" to differentiate them from teams in Organized Baseball (clubs formally associated with Major League Baseball), but they were actually professional enterprises. These teams signed players to contracts, paid them salaries during the season, provided transportation and housing on the road, charged admission to games, and were intent on turning a profit. An innovative idea for a barnstorming squad came to Green in 1895 when, as the player/manager of the Stromsburg town baseball club, he organized a game against the Genoa Indian Industrial School. To his surprise, "even in Nebraska, where an Indian is not at all a novelty, a base ball organization composed of red men drew everyone who was alive. When the Indians came to Stromsburg, business houses were closed and men, women and children turned out en. masse to see the copper-colored performers corral the festive fly and chase the elusive grounder. I reasoned that if an Indian base ball team was a good drawing card in Nebraska, it ought to do wonders further east if properly managed."2 After graduating law school in 1897, Green put his plan into action. Recruiting Native American players from the Genoa and Haskell schools, Green's All-Nebraska Indian Ball Team (soon shortened to the Nebraska Indians) embarked on a forty-seven game tour of Nebraska and Iowa. Large enthusiastic crowds came to watch the team play and cavort on the diamond. Green realized from the start that fans expected more than just a baseball game, and the Nebraska Indians entertained spectators with ball tricks, gags, and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,408
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0200,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207