MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3042818677 · doi:10.1159/000508608

Time Is Brain: A Call to Action to Support Stroke Centers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020· letter· en· W3042818677 sur OpenAlexaff
Afshin Borhani‐Haghighi, Reza Bavarsad Shahripour, Mahmoud Reza Azarpazhooh

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Neurology · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTelemedicinePandemicMedicineStroke (engine)Health carePopulationThrombolysisPersonal protective equipmentIsolation (microbiology)Medical emergencyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Call to actionNeurologyIntensive care medicineEconomic shortageDiseaseBusinessEnvironmental healthPathologyEconomic growthInfectious disease (medical specialty)BioinformaticsPsychiatryGovernment (linguistics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Editor,COVID-19 infections may affect other noncommunicable diseases, such as stroke, both directly and indirectly. Stroke may increase the probability of severe infection and mortality in COVID-19 infections. COVID-19 may lead to cardiac injury, arrhythmia, myocarditis, coagulopathy, and consequently stroke [1]. As an example, in Iran, neurologists identified some stroke cases among COVID-19 cases.Given the health infrastructure differences, economic differences, and previous differences in the burden of stroke between low- and middle-income (LMICs) versus high-income countries [2, 3], LMICs, in particular, may face a considerable strain with a possible negative impact on the healthcare delivery system. While we are globally fighting COVID-19, we need to implement feasible approaches to prevent or at least minimize any breakdown in the previous preventive and treatment approaches. We here recommend some suggestions and a call to action in LMICs.Healthcare professionals are at a higher risk of COVID-19 than the normal population [4]. Given the previous staff shortages in healthcare in many LMICs, providing personal protection equipment should be prioritized. We encourage international organizations, such as the World Federation of Neurology (WFN) and World Stroke Organization (WSO), to help provide personal protection equipment for LMICs.Social isolation does not mean lack of social interactions. We recommend health policymakers to authorize telemedicine technology in LMICs. Many important aspects of acute stroke management, from EMS dispatch to the selection of eligible cases for intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy, can be performed via Telestroke [5].Expensive telemedicine and telerehab programs are not appropriate for many LMIC situations. Low-priced, accessible, and secured cross-platform mobile applications can facilitate telemedicine/telerehab usage. Institutions may explore with the Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Board whether commercially available low-cost smartphone applications can substitute in locations where Telestroke networks are not available. Besides, the security and confidentiality of telemedicine systems should be assured and perhaps funded by social media companies.Early supported discharge services should be organized in LMICs [6]. Stroke centers need to practice 24/7 outpatient support using secured video-audio applications or at least telephone questionnaires to address vascular risk factors and assure medication compliance. Important screening questions with simple preventive measures to reduce the chance of deep vein thrombosis, falls, urinary tract infections, and pneumonia could be sent using Bluetooth/email to patients or the next of kin instead of paper-based documents. Based on anecdotal data, some crucial investigations such as formal swallowing assessments were reduced in some centers for fear of contagion.All unnecessary diagnostic activities should be summarized or merged for the sake of decreasing the rate of, or at least the fear of, COVID-19. If possible, it is crucial to separate CT units of COVID-19 cases from all other cases. Neurologists can send Holter monitoring to selected patients along with installation instructions or a telephone call for installation and a prepaid envelope to mail it back.Finally, stroke centers in the world need to support each other. Worldwide prestigious neurology centers, for example, WSO or WFN, can host a network of centers to share the best policies and experiences. LMICs need to be supported to continue fighting against stroke. Neurology is a big but close-knit family.The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.The authors did not receive any funding.Study concepts, study design, manuscript preparation, definition of intellectual content, manuscript editing, and manuscript revision/review: Afshin Borhani-Haghighi, M. Reza Azarpazhooh, and Reza Bavarsad Shahripour.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,300
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean NeurologyMême sujetLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Travaux en français237 207