MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3044111985 · doi:10.1111/aos.14538

Age‐related macular degeneration in a randomized trial of selenium and vitamin E in men: the Select Eye Endpoints (SEE) study (SWOG S0000B)

2020· article· en· W3044111985 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
William G. Christen, Amy K. Darke, John Michael Gaziano, Robert J. Glynn, Phyllis J. Goodman, Lori M. Minasian, Ian M. Thompson

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Ophthalmologica · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Cancer InstituteNational Eye Institute
Mots-clésMacular degenerationMedicineClinical endpointRandomized controlled trialProstate cancerEye examinationClinical trialCancerEpidemiologyCancer preventionVisual acuityGerontologyInternal medicineOphthalmology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Selenium and vitamin E are found in the human retina and retinal pigment epithelium and have been associated with risks of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in observational epidemiological studies (Khoo et al. 2019). We examined a possible role for these nutrients in AMD prevention in the Select Eye Endpoints (SEE) Study, an ancillary study of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of selenium (200 μg/d) and/or vitamin E (400 IU/d) in prevention of prostate cancer among 35 533 apparently healthy men aged 50 years and older (Lippman et al. 2005; Lippman et al. 2009). The parent SELECT trial was activated in July 2001 and included 427 clinical sites in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. Planned treatment and follow-up was 7–12 years. The SEE ancillary study began in September 2003, with funding from the National Eye Institute, and participation was voluntary. At semi-annual clinic visits, participants reported new diagnoses of AMD which were subsequently confirmed through medical record review. The primary AMD endpoint was incident AMD responsible for best-corrected visual acuity of 20/30 or worse (AMD 20/30). Secondary endpoints were total AMD (with or without vision loss) and advanced AMD (neovascular AMD or geographic atrophy). A priori power analysis indicated adequate study power (80%) to detect a 20% reduction in the primary endpoint of AMD 20/30 assuming participation of all SELECT sites. In September 2008, after an average follow-up of 5.6 years, the SELECT Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that supplements be discontinued due to a lack of efficacy on prostate cancer incidence. This early termination of the parent trial resulted in fewer than expected confirmed AMD events during the treatment period (by September 2008, 128 SELECT sites had agreed to participate in SEE) and thus limited statistical power for the primary vision endpoint of AMD 20/30. At the 128 participating SEE sites, 13 389 men did not report a prior diagnosis of AMD at baseline and were included in analyses (Table 1). A total of 133 incident cases of AMD were confirmed through medical record review. These included 21 cases of the primary endpoint of AMD 20/30. For selenium, there were 9 cases in the treated group and 12 in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–1.79). Similarly, for vitamin E, there were 9 cases in the treated group and 12 in the placebo group (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.31–1.77). For the secondary endpoint of total AMD (with or without vision loss), HRs were near the null value of 1.0 for both selenium (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75–1.47) and vitamin E (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.74–1.46). Cases of advanced AMD were limited (n = 14), and the CIs were wide (selenium; HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 0.79–7.98; vitamin E; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.35–2.82). In summary, the early termination of the parent SELECT trial limited our ability in this ancillary study to conduct meaningful analyses of the primary endpoint of AMD 20/30 or to draw firm conclusions for any endpoint. Nonetheless, we thought it was of sufficient scientific interest to report the results of analyses of the secondary endpoint of total AMD (with or without vision loss). These analyses, which were based on 133 confirmed cases, provided little evidence that long-term daily supplementation with selenium or vitamin E is likely to have a major beneficial or harmful effect on AMD incidence. The findings for vitamin E appear broadly consistent with the null findings of previous supplementation trials conducted among persons with early or no AMD (Schmidl et al. 2015; Evans et al. 2017). To our knowledge, the results for selenium represent the first randomized trial data to assess the effect of selenium (with or without vitamin E) in AMD prevention.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,189
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,561

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa OphthalmologicaMême sujetAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressTravaux en français237 207