MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044111985 · doi:10.1111/aos.14538

Age‐related macular degeneration in a randomized trial of selenium and vitamin E in men: the Select Eye Endpoints (SEE) study (SWOG S0000B)

2020· article· en· W3044111985 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William G. Christen, Amy K. Darke, John Michael Gaziano, Robert J. Glynn, Phyllis J. Goodman, Lori M. Minasian, Ian M. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Ophthalmologica · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Eye Institute
KeywordsMacular degenerationMedicineClinical endpointRandomized controlled trialProstate cancerEye examinationClinical trialCancerEpidemiologyCancer preventionVisual acuityGerontologyInternal medicineOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selenium and vitamin E are found in the human retina and retinal pigment epithelium and have been associated with risks of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in observational epidemiological studies (Khoo et al. 2019). We examined a possible role for these nutrients in AMD prevention in the Select Eye Endpoints (SEE) Study, an ancillary study of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of selenium (200 μg/d) and/or vitamin E (400 IU/d) in prevention of prostate cancer among 35 533 apparently healthy men aged 50 years and older (Lippman et al. 2005; Lippman et al. 2009). The parent SELECT trial was activated in July 2001 and included 427 clinical sites in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. Planned treatment and follow-up was 7–12 years. The SEE ancillary study began in September 2003, with funding from the National Eye Institute, and participation was voluntary. At semi-annual clinic visits, participants reported new diagnoses of AMD which were subsequently confirmed through medical record review. The primary AMD endpoint was incident AMD responsible for best-corrected visual acuity of 20/30 or worse (AMD 20/30). Secondary endpoints were total AMD (with or without vision loss) and advanced AMD (neovascular AMD or geographic atrophy). A priori power analysis indicated adequate study power (80%) to detect a 20% reduction in the primary endpoint of AMD 20/30 assuming participation of all SELECT sites. In September 2008, after an average follow-up of 5.6 years, the SELECT Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that supplements be discontinued due to a lack of efficacy on prostate cancer incidence. This early termination of the parent trial resulted in fewer than expected confirmed AMD events during the treatment period (by September 2008, 128 SELECT sites had agreed to participate in SEE) and thus limited statistical power for the primary vision endpoint of AMD 20/30. At the 128 participating SEE sites, 13 389 men did not report a prior diagnosis of AMD at baseline and were included in analyses (Table 1). A total of 133 incident cases of AMD were confirmed through medical record review. These included 21 cases of the primary endpoint of AMD 20/30. For selenium, there were 9 cases in the treated group and 12 in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–1.79). Similarly, for vitamin E, there were 9 cases in the treated group and 12 in the placebo group (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.31–1.77). For the secondary endpoint of total AMD (with or without vision loss), HRs were near the null value of 1.0 for both selenium (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75–1.47) and vitamin E (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.74–1.46). Cases of advanced AMD were limited (n = 14), and the CIs were wide (selenium; HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 0.79–7.98; vitamin E; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.35–2.82). In summary, the early termination of the parent SELECT trial limited our ability in this ancillary study to conduct meaningful analyses of the primary endpoint of AMD 20/30 or to draw firm conclusions for any endpoint. Nonetheless, we thought it was of sufficient scientific interest to report the results of analyses of the secondary endpoint of total AMD (with or without vision loss). These analyses, which were based on 133 confirmed cases, provided little evidence that long-term daily supplementation with selenium or vitamin E is likely to have a major beneficial or harmful effect on AMD incidence. The findings for vitamin E appear broadly consistent with the null findings of previous supplementation trials conducted among persons with early or no AMD (Schmidl et al. 2015; Evans et al. 2017). To our knowledge, the results for selenium represent the first randomized trial data to assess the effect of selenium (with or without vitamin E) in AMD prevention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OphthalmologicaSame topicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFrench-language works237,207