Effects of lipopolysaccharide exposure in primary bovine ruminal epithelial cells
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The objective of this study was to investigate whether cultured ruminal epithelial cells (REC) responded to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation and determine whether LPS induced a proinflammatory response. Primary bovine REC were isolated and grown in culture for 2 studies. In study 1, REC were isolated from Holstein bull calves (n = 8) and grown in culture for 10 to 12 d. Cells were then exposed to 0, 10,000, 50,000, or 200,000 endotoxin (E)U/mL of LPS (Escherichia coli O55:B5) for either 6 or 24 h. The effect of LPS exposure on cell viability was analyzed by flow cytometry using a propidium iodide stain. In study 2, cells were isolated from Holstein bull calves (n = 5) and yearling beef heifers (n = 4). Cells were exposed to either 1,000 or 50,000 EU/mL of LPS using the following conditions: (1) medium alone time-matched controls, (2) 12-h LPS exposure, (3) 24 h of LPS exposure, (4) 36 h of LPS exposure, (5) 12 h of LPS exposure followed by LPS removal for 24 h before restimulating with LPS for an additional 12 h (RPT), and (6) 12 h of LPS exposure followed by LPS removal for 36 (RVY). For both experiments, total RNA was extracted from REC and real-time quantitative PCR was performed to determine relative expression of genes for toll-like receptors (TLR2 and TLR4), proinflammatory cytokines (TNF and IL1B), chemokines (CXCL2 and CXCL8), a lipid mediator (PTGS2), and growth factor-like cytokines (CSF2 and IL7). In study 1, LPS exposure did not negatively affect cell viability. Treatment of cells with LPS resulted in increased transcript abundance for all genes analyzed. The TLR2, IL7, and TLR4 had a greater magnitude of change at 6 h compared with 24 h. Quadratic expression patterns were detected for TNF, IL1B, CXCL2, CXCL8, and CSF2. These results suggested that REC increase expression of proinflammatory genes following exposure to LPS. In study 2, all genes analyzed were upregulated in a quadratic manner following exposure to LPS for different time intervals. The TLR4, TNF, CXCL2, CXCL8, CSF2, and IL7 gene expression was significantly greater after a single 12 h of LPS exposure than after RPT exposure, suggesting repeated exposure of REC to LPS may induce a tolerogenic effect. When LPS was removed from the medium (RVY), transcript abundance for all genes analyzed decreased and expression of TLR2, TLR4, and IL7 returned to baseline levels, suggesting REC recovered following exposure to LPS. Overall, the data suggest cultured REC respond to LPS stimulation by increasing transcription of proinflammatory genes and this transcriptional response was influenced by the dose, duration, and frequency of LPS exposure.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».