Effects of lipopolysaccharide exposure in primary bovine ruminal epithelial cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate whether cultured ruminal epithelial cells (REC) responded to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation and determine whether LPS induced a proinflammatory response. Primary bovine REC were isolated and grown in culture for 2 studies. In study 1, REC were isolated from Holstein bull calves (n = 8) and grown in culture for 10 to 12 d. Cells were then exposed to 0, 10,000, 50,000, or 200,000 endotoxin (E)U/mL of LPS (Escherichia coli O55:B5) for either 6 or 24 h. The effect of LPS exposure on cell viability was analyzed by flow cytometry using a propidium iodide stain. In study 2, cells were isolated from Holstein bull calves (n = 5) and yearling beef heifers (n = 4). Cells were exposed to either 1,000 or 50,000 EU/mL of LPS using the following conditions: (1) medium alone time-matched controls, (2) 12-h LPS exposure, (3) 24 h of LPS exposure, (4) 36 h of LPS exposure, (5) 12 h of LPS exposure followed by LPS removal for 24 h before restimulating with LPS for an additional 12 h (RPT), and (6) 12 h of LPS exposure followed by LPS removal for 36 (RVY). For both experiments, total RNA was extracted from REC and real-time quantitative PCR was performed to determine relative expression of genes for toll-like receptors (TLR2 and TLR4), proinflammatory cytokines (TNF and IL1B), chemokines (CXCL2 and CXCL8), a lipid mediator (PTGS2), and growth factor-like cytokines (CSF2 and IL7). In study 1, LPS exposure did not negatively affect cell viability. Treatment of cells with LPS resulted in increased transcript abundance for all genes analyzed. The TLR2, IL7, and TLR4 had a greater magnitude of change at 6 h compared with 24 h. Quadratic expression patterns were detected for TNF, IL1B, CXCL2, CXCL8, and CSF2. These results suggested that REC increase expression of proinflammatory genes following exposure to LPS. In study 2, all genes analyzed were upregulated in a quadratic manner following exposure to LPS for different time intervals. The TLR4, TNF, CXCL2, CXCL8, CSF2, and IL7 gene expression was significantly greater after a single 12 h of LPS exposure than after RPT exposure, suggesting repeated exposure of REC to LPS may induce a tolerogenic effect. When LPS was removed from the medium (RVY), transcript abundance for all genes analyzed decreased and expression of TLR2, TLR4, and IL7 returned to baseline levels, suggesting REC recovered following exposure to LPS. Overall, the data suggest cultured REC respond to LPS stimulation by increasing transcription of proinflammatory genes and this transcriptional response was influenced by the dose, duration, and frequency of LPS exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".