Abstract IA30: Using single-cell, high-dimensional approaches to unravel tumor heterogeneity in pediatric cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Despite improving responses to up-front therapies for children with cancer, relapse remains a significant barrier to long-term remissions and cure. Curing children of cancer requires effectively targeting all cancer-initiating cell populations. Understanding what cellular populations have initiating capacity and lead to poor clinical outcomes requires examining tumors at the single-cell level. Here we discuss such an approach to predict relapse in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and response to common ALL therapies including glucocorticoids and chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Methods: Primary diagnostic or relapse bone marrow or peripheral blood samples or patient-derived xenografts were obtained under informed consent and IRB approval. Samples were clinically annotated for relevant prognostic features and clinical outcomes. Cryopreserved samples and healthy control bone marrows were treated in vitro with short-term stimulations to reveal signaling states. Cells were stained with a 40-antibody panel including relevant B-cell developmental proteins and intracellular signaling proteins. Samples were analyzed by mass cytometry (CyTOF). Patient samples underwent developmental classification in which each leukemia cell was assigned its most similar healthy counterpart. Further analysis was performed using various analysis methods, including machine learning modeling of relapse outcomes. Results: Studying over eighty primary patient diagnostic samples, we first organized the heterogeneous single-cell data classifying leukemic cells to 12 different subpopulations of B lymphopoiesis. We identified the transitional populations between early pro-B cells and late pre-B cells are expanded across almost all patients with BCP ALL. Extracting all measured features in these populations, we applied an elastic net model to determine cell populations associated with future relapse. This resulted in identification of early pre-B cells characterized by basally activated pCREB, pS6, pSYK, and p4EBP1 as predictive of future relapse. Further, these cells are apparent also at the time of relapse. Taking a similar approach, we also examined how these cell populations respond to treatment with glucocorticoids, a keystone of BCP ALL therapy. Similarly, we identify the same network activation in glucocorticoid-resistant patients associated also with a differentiation process. Interestingly, we can identify similar resistant phenotype in primary cells from patient treated in vivo with glucocorticoids. Finally, using these tools and methods, we describe CD19neg cells identified prior to treatment with CD19-targeted CAR T cells in patients who go on to suffer CD19neg relapse. Conclusions: Together, we present an approach to organizing single-cell tumor heterogeneity that reveals relapse-associated phenotypes. This highlights the translational potential of such an approach that could be applied to other single-cell studies in diverse tumor types. Citation Format: Kara L. Davis. Using single-cell, high-dimensional approaches to unravel tumor heterogeneity in pediatric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr IA30.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».