MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract IA30: Using single-cell, high-dimensional approaches to unravel tumor heterogeneity in pediatric cancer

2020· article· en· W3047276503 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kara L. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMass cytometryBone marrowCancerLeukemiaB cellOncologyImmunologyCancer researchInternal medicineAntibodyBiologyPhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Despite improving responses to up-front therapies for children with cancer, relapse remains a significant barrier to long-term remissions and cure. Curing children of cancer requires effectively targeting all cancer-initiating cell populations. Understanding what cellular populations have initiating capacity and lead to poor clinical outcomes requires examining tumors at the single-cell level. Here we discuss such an approach to predict relapse in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and response to common ALL therapies including glucocorticoids and chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Methods: Primary diagnostic or relapse bone marrow or peripheral blood samples or patient-derived xenografts were obtained under informed consent and IRB approval. Samples were clinically annotated for relevant prognostic features and clinical outcomes. Cryopreserved samples and healthy control bone marrows were treated in vitro with short-term stimulations to reveal signaling states. Cells were stained with a 40-antibody panel including relevant B-cell developmental proteins and intracellular signaling proteins. Samples were analyzed by mass cytometry (CyTOF). Patient samples underwent developmental classification in which each leukemia cell was assigned its most similar healthy counterpart. Further analysis was performed using various analysis methods, including machine learning modeling of relapse outcomes. Results: Studying over eighty primary patient diagnostic samples, we first organized the heterogeneous single-cell data classifying leukemic cells to 12 different subpopulations of B lymphopoiesis. We identified the transitional populations between early pro-B cells and late pre-B cells are expanded across almost all patients with BCP ALL. Extracting all measured features in these populations, we applied an elastic net model to determine cell populations associated with future relapse. This resulted in identification of early pre-B cells characterized by basally activated pCREB, pS6, pSYK, and p4EBP1 as predictive of future relapse. Further, these cells are apparent also at the time of relapse. Taking a similar approach, we also examined how these cell populations respond to treatment with glucocorticoids, a keystone of BCP ALL therapy. Similarly, we identify the same network activation in glucocorticoid-resistant patients associated also with a differentiation process. Interestingly, we can identify similar resistant phenotype in primary cells from patient treated in vivo with glucocorticoids. Finally, using these tools and methods, we describe CD19neg cells identified prior to treatment with CD19-targeted CAR T cells in patients who go on to suffer CD19neg relapse. Conclusions: Together, we present an approach to organizing single-cell tumor heterogeneity that reveals relapse-associated phenotypes. This highlights the translational potential of such an approach that could be applied to other single-cell studies in diverse tumor types. Citation Format: Kara L. Davis. Using single-cell, high-dimensional approaches to unravel tumor heterogeneity in pediatric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr IA30.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.410
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.006 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→