MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3048226865 · doi:10.1016/j.xjon.2020.08.004

Commentary: Organ ARCs: Assessment and repair centers in transplantation as gateways to meaningful therapeutic interventions

2020· editorial· en· W3048226865 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryan A. Whitson, Sylvester M. Black

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Open · 2020
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOrgan transplantationLung transplantationEx vivoTransplantationOrgan donationMedicineOrgan cultureLungGeneral surgerySurgeryIn vivoBiologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageNormothermic ex vivo organ perfusions enable the creation of organ assessment and repair centers (organ ARCs), which allows for improved donor organ quality and expanding donor organ availability.See Article page 164. Normothermic ex vivo organ perfusions enable the creation of organ assessment and repair centers (organ ARCs), which allows for improved donor organ quality and expanding donor organ availability. See Article page 164. In 2001, the world was shown the future of solid-organ transplantation with the successful ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and transplantation performed by Steen and colleagues from Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.1Steen S. Sjoberg T. Pierre L. Liao Q. Eriksson L. Algotsson L. Transplantation of lungs from a non-heart-beating donor.Lancet. 2001; 357: 825-829Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (470) Google Scholar Perhaps at the time, the revolutionary nature of the accomplishment was underappreciated, although it set into motion a vision that Dr Alexis Carrel and Charles Lindbergh had when they published their foreshadowing book The Culture of Organs in 1938.2Carrel A. Linbergh C.A. The Culture of Organs.1st ed. Paul B. Hoeber, New York1938Crossref Google Scholar From what may have been perceived as Shelleyian science fiction, the University of Toronto Lung Transplant Program under the leadership of Dr Keshavjee has made a reality.3Cypel M. Yeung J.C. Hirayama S. Rubacha M. Fischer S. Anraku M. et al.Technique for prolonged normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008; 27: 1319-1325Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (315) Google Scholar,4Keshavjee S. Human organ repair centers: fact or fiction?.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2020; 3: 164-168Google Scholar As with a great many of the pivotal advances in lung transplantation attained at the University of Toronto, the refinement and operationalization of a robust, cross-continent lung repair center using normothermic machine perfusion has had a profound impact on their recipients lives but also on the whole field of transplantation. In this month's edition of the Journal, Keshavjee4Keshavjee S. Human organ repair centers: fact or fiction?.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2020; 3: 164-168Google Scholar provides us with the history of the evolution of the Toronto EVLP program and their realization of Organ Repair Centers. While the Toronto Lung Transplant Program has brought lung assessment and repair into the mainstream, the implications of normothermic ex vivo organ perfusion (NEVOP) on the field of transplantation as a whole has fundamentally been changed. With the conceptualization and realization of NEVOP, 2 fundamental limitations of transplantation have been overcome: first, with NEVOP, time becomes somewhat relative. Second, with NEVOP, we have the ability to repair donor organs once thought to be marginal, extended criteria, or poor quality. When we are able to maintain organs and ensure viability with NEVOP, whether via blood-based or acellular perfusates, we make ischemic time relative. This enables the transport of organs across vast distances. Removing time and distance as barriers allows for better donor–recipient matching, both size and immunologically, both of these contribute to improved outcomes. As we are able to ensure organ viability over time, we have the ability to assess the organ for adequate quality, both physiologically and with molecular biology. This combination with NEVOP lets us create true organ assessment and repair centers, or organ assessment and repair centers,5Whitson B.A. Black S.M. Organ assessment and repair centers: the future of transplantation is near.World J Transplant. 2014; 4: 40-42Crossref Google Scholar not only for lungs but hearts, livers, kidneys, and potentially even pancreas, intestines, or vascular composite allografts. With the NEVOP platform, one has the ability to deliver nanoparticle or viral vectors,6Suda T. Tagawa T. Kanaan S.A. Kozower B.D. Daddi N. Mohanakumar T. et al.Adenovirus encoding soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor immunoglobulin prolongs gene expression of a cotransfected reporter gene in rat lung.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 1155-1161Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar modify genes,7Daniel-Moreno A. Lamsfus-Calle A. Raju J. Antony J.S. Handgretinger R. Mezger M. CRISPR/Cas9-modified hematopoietic stem cells-present and future perspectives for stem cell transplantation.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019; 54: 1940-1950Crossref Scopus (11) Google Scholar or even scaffold organs.8Tapias L.F. Ott H.C. Decellularized scaffolds as a platform for bioengineered organs.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2014; 19: 145-152Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar This would allow for truly personalized medicine by tailoring the donor organ to each recipient. Another perspective to normothermic perfusion and organ repair, which Dr Keshavjee refers to, is the commercialization of organ repair centers. Conceptually, there are benefits to reproducibility and focused expertise, although one would be a little cautious of commercializing organ transplantation. Done thoughtfully, the types of services provided by Lung Bioengineering would extend the benefits of NEVOP to those transplant centers that do not have the infrastructure to do NEVOP in house. As with so many of the advances in lung transplantation, the University of Toronto Lung Transplant Program has led the way in normothermic EVLP and will continue to do so. These advances will lead us into a new era of NEVOP and organ assessment and repair centers to expand the benefit of transplantation to more patients with improved outcomes. Human organ repair centers: Fact or fiction?JTCVS OpenVol. 3PreviewFeature Editor Note—Although lung transplantation continues to evolve with the refinement of surgical techniques and improvements in organ preservation, there continues to be a critical shortage of donor lungs available, and a substantial number of donor lungs are discarded due to questionable quality. The University of Toronto group has published extensively on the use of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to evaluate marginal donor lungs, demonstrating that many of these lungs can be successfully transplanted. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,301
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,439
Écart entre enseignants0,384 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJTCVS OpenMême sujetTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesTravaux en français237 207