MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048226865 · doi:10.1016/j.xjon.2020.08.004

Commentary: Organ ARCs: Assessment and repair centers in transplantation as gateways to meaningful therapeutic interventions

2020· editorial· en· W3048226865 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryan A. Whitson, Sylvester M. Black

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Open · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrgan transplantationLung transplantationEx vivoTransplantationOrgan donationMedicineOrgan cultureLungGeneral surgerySurgeryIn vivoBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central MessageNormothermic ex vivo organ perfusions enable the creation of organ assessment and repair centers (organ ARCs), which allows for improved donor organ quality and expanding donor organ availability.See Article page 164. Normothermic ex vivo organ perfusions enable the creation of organ assessment and repair centers (organ ARCs), which allows for improved donor organ quality and expanding donor organ availability. See Article page 164. In 2001, the world was shown the future of solid-organ transplantation with the successful ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and transplantation performed by Steen and colleagues from Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.1Steen S. Sjoberg T. Pierre L. Liao Q. Eriksson L. Algotsson L. Transplantation of lungs from a non-heart-beating donor.Lancet. 2001; 357: 825-829Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (470) Google Scholar Perhaps at the time, the revolutionary nature of the accomplishment was underappreciated, although it set into motion a vision that Dr Alexis Carrel and Charles Lindbergh had when they published their foreshadowing book The Culture of Organs in 1938.2Carrel A. Linbergh C.A. The Culture of Organs.1st ed. Paul B. Hoeber, New York1938Crossref Google Scholar From what may have been perceived as Shelleyian science fiction, the University of Toronto Lung Transplant Program under the leadership of Dr Keshavjee has made a reality.3Cypel M. Yeung J.C. Hirayama S. Rubacha M. Fischer S. Anraku M. et al.Technique for prolonged normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008; 27: 1319-1325Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (315) Google Scholar,4Keshavjee S. Human organ repair centers: fact or fiction?.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2020; 3: 164-168Google Scholar As with a great many of the pivotal advances in lung transplantation attained at the University of Toronto, the refinement and operationalization of a robust, cross-continent lung repair center using normothermic machine perfusion has had a profound impact on their recipients lives but also on the whole field of transplantation. In this month's edition of the Journal, Keshavjee4Keshavjee S. Human organ repair centers: fact or fiction?.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2020; 3: 164-168Google Scholar provides us with the history of the evolution of the Toronto EVLP program and their realization of Organ Repair Centers. While the Toronto Lung Transplant Program has brought lung assessment and repair into the mainstream, the implications of normothermic ex vivo organ perfusion (NEVOP) on the field of transplantation as a whole has fundamentally been changed. With the conceptualization and realization of NEVOP, 2 fundamental limitations of transplantation have been overcome: first, with NEVOP, time becomes somewhat relative. Second, with NEVOP, we have the ability to repair donor organs once thought to be marginal, extended criteria, or poor quality. When we are able to maintain organs and ensure viability with NEVOP, whether via blood-based or acellular perfusates, we make ischemic time relative. This enables the transport of organs across vast distances. Removing time and distance as barriers allows for better donor–recipient matching, both size and immunologically, both of these contribute to improved outcomes. As we are able to ensure organ viability over time, we have the ability to assess the organ for adequate quality, both physiologically and with molecular biology. This combination with NEVOP lets us create true organ assessment and repair centers, or organ assessment and repair centers,5Whitson B.A. Black S.M. Organ assessment and repair centers: the future of transplantation is near.World J Transplant. 2014; 4: 40-42Crossref Google Scholar not only for lungs but hearts, livers, kidneys, and potentially even pancreas, intestines, or vascular composite allografts. With the NEVOP platform, one has the ability to deliver nanoparticle or viral vectors,6Suda T. Tagawa T. Kanaan S.A. Kozower B.D. Daddi N. Mohanakumar T. et al.Adenovirus encoding soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor immunoglobulin prolongs gene expression of a cotransfected reporter gene in rat lung.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 1155-1161Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar modify genes,7Daniel-Moreno A. Lamsfus-Calle A. Raju J. Antony J.S. Handgretinger R. Mezger M. CRISPR/Cas9-modified hematopoietic stem cells-present and future perspectives for stem cell transplantation.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019; 54: 1940-1950Crossref Scopus (11) Google Scholar or even scaffold organs.8Tapias L.F. Ott H.C. Decellularized scaffolds as a platform for bioengineered organs.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2014; 19: 145-152Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar This would allow for truly personalized medicine by tailoring the donor organ to each recipient. Another perspective to normothermic perfusion and organ repair, which Dr Keshavjee refers to, is the commercialization of organ repair centers. Conceptually, there are benefits to reproducibility and focused expertise, although one would be a little cautious of commercializing organ transplantation. Done thoughtfully, the types of services provided by Lung Bioengineering would extend the benefits of NEVOP to those transplant centers that do not have the infrastructure to do NEVOP in house. As with so many of the advances in lung transplantation, the University of Toronto Lung Transplant Program has led the way in normothermic EVLP and will continue to do so. These advances will lead us into a new era of NEVOP and organ assessment and repair centers to expand the benefit of transplantation to more patients with improved outcomes. Human organ repair centers: Fact or fiction?JTCVS OpenVol. 3PreviewFeature Editor Note—Although lung transplantation continues to evolve with the refinement of surgical techniques and improvements in organ preservation, there continues to be a critical shortage of donor lungs available, and a substantial number of donor lungs are discarded due to questionable quality. The University of Toronto group has published extensively on the use of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to evaluate marginal donor lungs, demonstrating that many of these lungs can be successfully transplanted. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS OpenSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207