<i>Experimental Selves: Person and Experience in Early Modern Europe</i> . By <scp>Christopher Braider</scp> <i>Experimental Selves: Person and Experience in Early Modern Europe</i> . By BraiderChristopher. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018. 448 pp.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In this book, Christopher Braider grapples with the complex way selfhood was conceptualized and articulated in the early modern period across Europe. He underscores the manifold nature of the self, ‘or to use the word early moderns more freely chose, the person’, which was ‘modelled for them in the avalanche of portraits that signalled its newfound primacy and ubiquity’ (p. 5). Braider ambitiously suggests that we need to rethink a number of key problems concerning not just the nature of self, or the language used to describe this, but also of knowledge and of experience. He undertakes this task by positing that the early modern concept of person was an ‘experimental’ phenomenon. By exploiting the dense semantic range the term ‘person’ enjoyed in early modern usage, he demonstrates its four-dimensional quality (as a composite of mind, body, and social relation over time). Furthermore, he suggests that, like the experiments in the field of science occurring across the period, ‘person too is an experiment, a precipitate of the process of trial and error through which it comes to know itself’ (p. 23). Through the case studies that span the following seven chapters, he then determines to put this hypothesis of experimental selves to the test. In so doing, he also deftly demonstrates that art itself is inherently experimental at its heart: texts and pictures not only represent the world, ‘they intervene in it, changing it, and changing us even as we in turn change them by asking the questions we ask and by performing the trials and committing the errors that are integral to all acts of reading, viewing and thought’ (p. 334). The chapters on the theatre offer particularly original readings and view the theatrical space as a unique laboratory. In Chapter 5, which looks at what he calls ‘the poetics of agency’, the distinction drawn between the considerable freedom Corneille affords his characters, as opposed to the more constrictive position imposed by Racine, is arguably rather overstated. However, Braider demonstrates a crucial difference between tragedy versus comedy when he argues that Molière’s plays and actors underscore the experimental and thus open-ended aspect of all types of action. Overall, this study examines an impressive range of authors from the late-fifteenth-century Neoplatonist Pico della Mirandola to the eighteenth-century philosopher Kant. The case studies are drawn from a wide range of cultural and disciplinary contexts. In addition to theatre, the chapters discuss the early novel (focusing on La Princesse de Clèves), the art of portraiture, pictorial experiments in vision and perception, theory of knowledge, and the experimental scientific work of the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This engaging book certainly covers much ground, but Braider is also keenly aware of what is not included. He regrets the lack of a chapter on autobiography, the limited space afforded to fiction (particularly picaresque and epistolary novels), and to the eighteenth-century cult of sensibility. There is ample material for a second volume. In the absence of Braider penning one, he has, nonetheless, drawn attention to a range of topics that are sure to inspire many other scholars within the field.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».