MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049736570 · doi:10.1093/fs/knaa143

<i>Experimental Selves: Person and Experience in Early Modern Europe</i> . By <scp>Christopher Braider</scp> <i>Experimental Selves: Person and Experience in Early Modern Europe</i> . By BraiderChristopher. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018. 448 pp.

2020· article· en· W3049736570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emilia Wilton-Godberfforde

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriod (music)PhenomenonPsychologyPortraitRelation (database)AestheticsEpistemologyHistoryArtArt historyPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this book, Christopher Braider grapples with the complex way selfhood was conceptualized and articulated in the early modern period across Europe. He underscores the manifold nature of the self, ‘or to use the word early moderns more freely chose, the person’, which was ‘modelled for them in the avalanche of portraits that signalled its newfound primacy and ubiquity’ (p. 5). Braider ambitiously suggests that we need to rethink a number of key problems concerning not just the nature of self, or the language used to describe this, but also of knowledge and of experience. He undertakes this task by positing that the early modern concept of person was an ‘experimental’ phenomenon. By exploiting the dense semantic range the term ‘person’ enjoyed in early modern usage, he demonstrates its four-dimensional quality (as a composite of mind, body, and social relation over time). Furthermore, he suggests that, like the experiments in the field of science occurring across the period, ‘person too is an experiment, a precipitate of the process of trial and error through which it comes to know itself’ (p. 23). Through the case studies that span the following seven chapters, he then determines to put this hypothesis of experimental selves to the test. In so doing, he also deftly demonstrates that art itself is inherently experimental at its heart: texts and pictures not only represent the world, ‘they intervene in it, changing it, and changing us even as we in turn change them by asking the questions we ask and by performing the trials and committing the errors that are integral to all acts of reading, viewing and thought’ (p. 334). The chapters on the theatre offer particularly original readings and view the theatrical space as a unique laboratory. In Chapter 5, which looks at what he calls ‘the poetics of agency’, the distinction drawn between the considerable freedom Corneille affords his characters, as opposed to the more constrictive position imposed by Racine, is arguably rather overstated. However, Braider demonstrates a crucial difference between tragedy versus comedy when he argues that Molière’s plays and actors underscore the experimental and thus open-ended aspect of all types of action. Overall, this study examines an impressive range of authors from the late-fifteenth-century Neoplatonist Pico della Mirandola to the eighteenth-century philosopher Kant. The case studies are drawn from a wide range of cultural and disciplinary contexts. In addition to theatre, the chapters discuss the early novel (focusing on La Princesse de Clèves), the art of portraiture, pictorial experiments in vision and perception, theory of knowledge, and the experimental scientific work of the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This engaging book certainly covers much ground, but Braider is also keenly aware of what is not included. He regrets the lack of a chapter on autobiography, the limited space afforded to fiction (particularly picaresque and epistolary novels), and to the eighteenth-century cult of sensibility. There is ample material for a second volume. In the absence of Braider penning one, he has, nonetheless, drawn attention to a range of topics that are sure to inspire many other scholars within the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207