MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3055023011 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.063

64 Is it enough: An Assessment of Parental Satisfaction with an International Adoption Clinic at a Pediatric Tertiary Care Center

2020· article· en· W3055023011 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Léa Restivo, Gurpreet Khaira, Amonpreet Sandhu, Susan Kuhn

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChild Welfare and Adoption
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeglectInstitutionalisationMedicinePopulationTertiary careHealth careFamily medicinePsychologyNursingPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background The circumstance in which internationally adopted children are born and live prior to adoption put them at high risk for health issues. Nearly all adoptees have complex medical conditions, the most common being cleft lip/palate, orthopaedic problems, infectious diseases, congenital heart diseases, and/or nutritional deficiencies, as well as cognitive impairments, and/or developmental delays. Specifically, nearly all institutionalized children will have expressive language delays and most will have motor delays. Although improvement can be seen with time, most do not attain their full potential. Additionally, by nature of adoption, all children experience trauma. In some situations, this will be further compounded by neglect and/or abuse faced prior to adoption, or during institutionalization. Consequently, almost all adoptees develop attachment difficulties. Trained medical professionals are required to screen, monitor, and provide management suggestions for this complex and unique population. Objectives To our knowledge, parental experience of an international adoption clinic has not yet been published. This parent-based evaluation of the parental experience at a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic, provides insights that may help guide provision of care for this high-risk population in our centre, throughout the country, and internationally. Design/Methods A qualitative, exploratory design was employed using telephone interviews of eighteen parents of adoptees assessed by a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic since 2010. This approach was chosen to allow for more extensive exploration of parental experience, and to identify barriers and facilitators of care. Interviews were 30 to 90 minutes, semi-structured, and transcribed verbatim. Field notes were made during the interviews to note intonation and major concerns, and were used to supplement transcripts during data analysis. Questions covered experiences with pre-adoption counselling, arranging the first clinic visit, health and developmental assessments, life after clinic discharge, and general comments/suggestions. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcripts using Maguire’s step-by-step guide. Results Analysis resulted in four main themes and seven subthemes. The first theme was “difficulty of international adoption”. The second theme “utility and impact of services offered” was subdivided into “pre-adoption counselling”, “clinic visits and medical assessments”, and “post adoption seminars”. The third theme “the administrative procedures of the clinic” was subdivided into “timing and ease of organizing a first visit”, and “hours of operation”. The final theme “gaps in care” was divided into “ongoing difficulty with attachment”, and “allied healthcare services”. These results demonstrate that parents of internationally adopted children often feel overwhelmed by the medical needs of their children and feel unsupported. They recommend comprehensive and in-person pre-adoption counselling with standard referral processes to ensure timely access to care. Post-arrival medical and developmental assessments should be flexible and complete. Most importantly, clinics should incorporate support from allied healthcare professionals, including social work, psychology, occupational therapy, and physiotherapy. In particular, parents were interested in further management of attachment. Conclusion This first parent-based evaluation of the parental experience at a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic provides insights that may help guide provision of care to this high-risk population in centres across Canada and internationally.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,021
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,363
Écart entre enseignants0,336 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetChild Welfare and AdoptionTravaux en français237 207